Well done mate.... and I for one am grateful for any info you have if you're minded to post it up. Keep things in perspective....you don't have any obligation to anyone to justify yourself or to defend the information you have shared. From what I've seen, you don't appear to be getting any crap from anyone either here or over the road. I'm pleased to hear this is still ongoing from the info you have and desperately hoping for a successful and timely conclusion to all this....as we all are.
Thanks mate, appreciate this and for confirming things still appear to be going in the right direction.
Thanks for the update. I know you’re not full of crap and you’re doing the right thing in balancing it. I have heard talk that things are fragile as of yesterday.
A voice of reason, you do know you aren’t supposed to post sensible info on hear as it upsets Bob and his alter egos
Bob will be right and will know what's going on, his communication is hot and cold though, if you speak to him privately he's much easier to understand and is sound, like I've said already I think what's he's talking about on the SMB is more about how someone would define a takeover. Me personally I wouldn't mind Donald keeping 10% if it made the sale easier on everyone and we have backing that can positively affect the club and the youth set up.
I would mind Donald having a share in future success as this would mean he would benefit from others when he has failed for the past 12 years. He should be no where near any football club
Agreed. I'm desperate for Donald to have no say whatsoever in the running of the club. I'd like him gone completely but if he only ended up a minor shareholder, basically just sitting there hoping the value increased and not involved at all aside from that, I'd be happy enough. The issue we'd have would be partly, if the new people wanted to invest a considerable sum, could Donald afford to invest 10% of it? The other issue is that I can't imagine many potential purchasers being happy with it. If they're going to completely change the way the club is ran, invest in it, put things in place and get us potentially back to the top flight, will they really want someone who has proven themselves incompetent e,ven at the relatively easy step of getting out of league one, to reap 10% of the rewards? Especially when they know the person who owns the club currently isn't vastly wealthy, will be losing money this season and likely can't afford to sustain it for long. I can't see anything being agreed for a good while tbh.
Seems to be a lot of conflicting reports banded about now. Takeover, investment, Who's involved etc. Dunno who to believe. Wears ya down a tad.
Your avatar....was that from when they were discussing a prem man utd/Liverpool 11, and Giggs was left out?
[QUOTE="Lewberry Pie, post: 14130574, member: 1049627"]Bob will be right and will know what's going on, his communication is hot and cold though, if you speak to him privately he's much easier to understand and is sound, like I've said already I think what's he's talking about on the SMB is more about how someone would define a takeover. Me personally I wouldn't mind Donald keeping 10% if it made the sale easier on everyone and we have backing that can positively affect the club and the youth set up.[/QUOTE] Aye, just like he knows Don paid the loan back to the Yanks and Nixon works for the Chronicle. He's a ****ing attention seeking idiot.
His idea of investment is Donald selling his shares I think, Been told nothings changed and everything is still on plan
