Coronavirus

But the reason for the quarentine is because it can take the 2 weeks to show up. So an airport test proves nothing,and can take up to 48hrs to get the results and can still infect people on the way home.

 

possibly the wrong thread for your kinks discussion dude.

 

Whilst it can take up to 2 weeks to show, it often shows up much quicker ... flight from Zante to Cardiff recently was carrying lots of already infected ... a test at the airport could have stopped that group from further spreading by putting them straight into isolation.

 

just a bad excuse for not sorting mass testing

 

I'd agree .. the failure to deliver on testing levels is truly abysmal ... some bloke on the news the other day told that he would need to drive to Scotland if he wanted a rest WTAF?

 

They take 2 days to get results, so still have to travel home, wouldn't make any difference.

 

Lots of shootings and stabbing been going on.

 

https://www.ethicaleditor.com/top-stories/arena-inquiry-will-leave-no-stone-unturned/

YET!!

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...bomb-survivors-denied-central-role-in-inquiry

 

Watched the Primodos report on SKY this evening. Certainly demonstrates to what lengths drug companies, so called independent reviewers and even doctors and their associates, will go to to at the very least distort the truth and at worse cover up evidence, such as burning files, all to silence and discredit the victims of this scandal. Shocking!

 

i keep telling you but no one takes it seriously .

 

Transport Secretary Grant Shapps told MPs: "Where people don't quarantine, I just want to make this very clear for the benefit for everybody in the House - that is a criminal offence.

"If you don't quarantine for 14 days and you take this virus and you spread it around, you are endangering the people that you love and others that you've never even met - and you can get a criminal record for it."

He later added: "We absolutely will be stepping up measures and I'm working with the home secretary and others to secure that, and I again will say more about it very soon."

 

Tell me what bruv?

For what it's worth I've never trusted pharmaceutical companies, their not interested in any cures that don't make them large obscene amounts of money.

 

Or without side effects that they can then produce something else for.

 

im usually nuts for suggesting big pharma is a entity of profit but here we are...........................you sure you want 2 take a vaccine dished out within a year.

in bill gates we trust

 

transport secretary.........what the fk has law gotta do with that twat.......like a scene out of a well known film

please log in to view this image

 

I've said before that I won't be taking the vaccine. Nothing to do with Bill Gates though.

 

No one has ever suggested the pharmaceutical companies are not corrupt, we just choose not to worship some guy called Icke in the way that you do.

As soon has you devoutly decide to follow something or someone in the way that you do, as if a religious god, your argument becomes tainted with bias and conspiracy theories rather than fact. That then makes you no better than the so called independent reviewers of those drug companies.

In the same way you keep on about George Orwell, I don't need lessons on the thoughts of Orwell as I agree with some of them, what is off putting is some drug crazed Welsh guy trying to sell me his theories as though we should join his cult.

What I'm saying in short is you're a fooking nut job

 

Why bro?

 

Because they normally take the best part of a decade to produce, and I'm not convinced that one knocked up in 12 months won't have any side effects.

I'll take my chances as a young'un who's not at any increased risk.