I’m not sure what else he could say If there was an issue with DD it would flag up a problem with the accounts and his running of the club, why did you think Campbell’s (thank god) and FPP’s bid failed last summer?? DD If he said he did envisage issues with DD that would putt off potential buyers possibly, or devalue the clubs value (in his eyes) of £37m He’s hoping (like he did) that some one comes along, rushes DD, doesn’t do their job properly and buys the club in hast.... no ones going to do that, but that’s his naive plan in my opinion till he gets desperate as the clubs haemorrhaging money. As I’ve said previous, he’s gambling
And then go off on one about an internal redistribution of shares with a creditor buying in not being the clean start the club needs. He's either repeating random things he's read, or he knows that's likely and is trying to convince people that his "fresh start" would be better.
I don’t believe you are a Sunderland fan. I believe you’re a “professional” board poster paid to pass on disinformation.
Not because of the accounts. Why would it be, we've seen those accounts now, there's nothing bad in them, the one thing Donald seems to have done quite well is handle the financial side.
It really is incredulous, you must be the only one who is concerned about any of the chancers controlling the club.. No ****er else is.
Micky Gray’s rallying cry then silence. Storey’s inane ramblings. SD’s insistence he wants shot. Bloomberg and Forbes citing Fuhrman’s interest in the club. FFP having an outstanding and what looks like unmanageable financial hold on the club. Salma Hayek. Holly. Eva. Monica. What’s clear is that if there’s one thing we can sure of, it that there’s absolutely SOMETHING going on.
So why mention DD if nothing was happening. As you put it. This is why posters are not believing you because it’s obvious something is happening despite you saying it’s not
Some **** changed all of our zodiac signs as well. If that isn’t a clear sign of a takeover I’ve got a hairy fanny.
He comes across as lying mood hoover on a wind up and I think the only source he has is own head. However, if it turns out that there was no period of exclusivity and Barnes had been fed a line, if there were no meetings regarding a takeover, and 'Chairman' Don is cackling like a mad Bond villain at the first home game, I'll apologise profusely and say fair play.
I don’t want to get involved with any pile on, but the tone of your posts, your arguments and even phrases you use are exactly how/what Kittenmittens posted before his ban. "If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it's a duck". I would bet a pound to a pinch of ****e you are that man
Campbell's deal didnt fail because of DD. it failed because he couldn't come up with the cash or backers
Obviously something is happening as SD has wanted to sell the club from the day he walked through the door SD mentions DD and it throws weight behind his running of the club, that he actually wants out and that he doesn’t see any issues with a take over If and again it’s a big If someone does club comes forward, looks over the books and then turns away because of something found with DD... because of the agreement they have signed they can’t say why the walked away, SD has already told us all DD won’t be an issue (when it actually is)... then SD can say he’s trying to sell, he’s getting ‘buyers’ but it’s not his fault they haven’t bought and he clings on a little longer in the hope he’ll still get his big pay day in the championship
