I doubt anything will change as it would appear they've reached a stale mate situation... It's merely just the fading embers now.
why walk away? Public statement on that, save face, rather than being rejected. they will be getting the LV luggage ready for chopped up PL office staff bodies as we speak.
That's the trouble - we don't know. To be honest I would ask questions about their ease of withdrawal. Staveley and Reubens appear determined. PIF couldn't give a toss.
They needed PIF more than the other way around.. PIF just had long enough to think you know what this idea no longer appeals...
People on here (@The emerald guard) need to stop feeding him. He's a bitter toffee, bog standard fair and easily ignorable. I have a few on Facebook and jesus, they hate everyone.
He needs no feeding I'm not afraid of saying I still think this might happen either. That's my last comment on the subject unless anything changes though..
sure the other two are determined. 20% and the possible growth that £35m initial would give, dividend etc. Why would PIF need them, they offer nothing to their £280m and would need to kick in 10% each at every investment stage. The RB have plenty of ‘book wealth’ but that Amanda, does she?
Listen, and listen carefully... There's a team out there without a single board member. We can start fresh... See avi for details.
You have spent all morning letting me twist and turn you on this. Cheers, been awake since 3am with the little one so need some entertainment
I'm picking a side outside the premier league mate.. Then it's like winning twice. Thinking athletico maybe I'm fond of them for no reason whatsoever
Answered your question bru, u a simpleton? fool spends his time following Chaos around cos he cant handle bants on the prem forum.
