You jumped to the conclusion pal. I stated my opinion. Still nothing in this at this time to show he had anything to do with it. I will stick also that the McCanns know what happened. you jumped quickly on this after your Allegri to Newcastle assertion.
Everyone accused them of it half of that super popular documentary was dedicated to all the reasons why the McCanns weren't the killers, the shoddy police work, the crappy journalists everything was just done so they could get the quickest possible verdict and close the case. But everyone conveniently ignored that stuff because they'd already decided it was the parents. I am 100% convinced and will never be swayed that the whole reason people blame the parents is because they're middle class. It pissed people off.
find a post where I have at any point defended him, I clearly stated that my view is that the McCanns know what happened/were some way involved. I think I will have even stated they got the sedatives from him. don’t like my view, put me on ignore or block me.
You jumped to a conclusion and it's looking increasingly wrong... Mines looking increasingly right. That's were this is at If you'd never accused the mccans then I wouldnt laugh at you jumping to the innocent till proven guilty position. Like I say we're going to find out.. You should be hoping they nail him. Not worrying about whether your accusation was right. How many times.. They know its him
**** off you bellend. You have jumped on this and tried to link it to my view on the McCanns. Until they dig up her bones and prove him guilty you are just on some hollow mission to show your guess was right. what happens to your view if they don’t find her? That’s what’s this is about, still nothing to show I defended this bloke from you also. Tin can head.
Where the **** have I said that you mong. **** it. Some special type of idiot I have here following me about.
You know it and so do I You've been wrong for 13 years and rather than man up and simply saying " hhmmyou know what It looks like I was wrong" you've jumped to saying I'm in the wrong for making my own accusation toward a convicted child rapist... 1. You accuse people not charged 2. The police say they know a Convicted child rapist killed her. 3.I make my accusation. 4.you say I'm wrong to accuse him he's not been charged I know you can't be that thick, so I've concluded that you're keen on seeing this already convicted child rapist get away with this to save face .
But we've watched police sifting through piles of soil on the perimeter of the huge hole before pushing it back into the hole. Three skips took away debris. What we haven't seen are any obvious forensic investigators in their familiar protective suits and it is not clear if any evidence has been removed from the site. A source said: "It seems a wide, rather unfocused search, a fishing expedition in a location the police have known about since 2017 when the suspect came into the frame.
I'm not really sure why Chaos is getting **** about accusing someone who hasn't been convicted of anything yet, by people who have vilified and made accusations about others without any conviction. Seems like double standards really? **** knows, this obviously looks promising.
