Coronavirus

Yes, because I believe that masks cause more potential harm than good.

 

You could be busy wumming on the match day thread

You won’t be getting a reply from Comm till tonight

 

What will make me very angry, is if a family member in need of treatment for a life threatening illness suffers more, or dies, as a result of increased waiting lists because NHS resources have been unnecessarily concentrated on one virus that has not proven to be as deadly as we were all told it was.

The fact that you all seem to be ignoring is that the likes of cancer, heart disease, and many other conditions are far more likely to kill you than covid 19. Yet so effective has been the brainwashing on most people that you are obsessed with it.

 

I like to lay a trail of crumbs for him, Bruv.

 

Of course more vulnerable people are going to die from covid 19, because this is a new strain of virus. Our bodies need to adjust. It's exactly the same with a new strain of flu. I stated this clearly in a previous post. Why do you ignore this?

I also stated that you cannot hide from this type of virus, any more than you can hide from the flu or the common cold. It's going to get you, eventually. The Government, with its fear mongering about "a second spike" is being disingenuous, because its insistence on a lockdown has effectively guaranteed that there will be a second spike. No one is pointing this out, yet - you watch - the propaganda will use it for fear mongering and more pointless draconian infringements on our freedom and dignity.

 

I didn't ignore it. The same CDC report on rates of death from flu from 2010 to 2016 also stated that from the period 1976 to 2010 the rates of flu related death in U.S. was 3000 to 50,000. So they've increased on average, or at best stayed the same. Even if you want to make the flu comparison, I can't see how you can say ppl will naturally become more resistant to Covid over time when the data above contradicts this.

 

a) Do you still stand by your 110,000 deaths worldwide prediction?

b) Can we stop wearing seatbelts now deaths in road traffic accidents are lower?

 

If the numbers had been massaged as widely as they have been for covid 19, I suspect flus of the past would have looked like apocalyptic plagues.

The Government has exaggerated and misrepresented.

But you call it what you want to call it.

 

Huh?

What the hell has that got to do with anything?

Would wearing a face mask prevent more car accidents?

 

How long has the flu been around?

How long have they been studying covid 19?

 

Given that flu deaths tend to be based on estimation whereas covid19 deaths tend to be based on people who have tested positive what are you basing this on? Are you able to link any reliable proof/evidence of this wild claim.

Personally I think the zerganoids are behind it, as i laid out in previous posts. It is indeed one massive conspiracy and i have good reason to believe that no-one has actually died of Covid19, they have all been converted into skinwalkers for the purpose of inter-planetary hostile actions. I hope you get your information from the washing machine whirring like i do as it is one of the more reliable method of communication in these confusing times.

 

I just assumed that as we are ignoring lock-down and social distancing then presumably we are in the habit of ignoring all preventative measures and their certain effects on the raw numbers. If fewer people are dying in road traffic accidents then presumably we no longer need to worry about drunk-driving, speeding, seat-belts or any of the other measures that have come in. Cars just must not be as dangerous as we thought they were 50 years ago so lets slack all that off.

I reckon we should do the same with all health and safety, once the numbers go down it's evidence we didn't need it in the first place. You make a good point which is impossible to argue with. Now I'll catch you all later, I'm off to fireproof my house with asbestos.

 

What possible motive would a Govt, who at the start of lockdown stated that 20,000 deaths would be a ‘good outcome’ have for manipulating the figures upwards?

Also if this was a thing, why has Hancock been desperately trying to suggest this the PHE numbers are somehow overstated when compared to other nations, because we have the temerity to count anyone who’s been ill with it for more than 28 days before death?

Also, yet again you conveniently ignore the excess deaths figures which are merely indisputable fact.

Your argument has more holes than a Swiss cheese and a complete lack of holistic thinking.

 

Have you considered the 30000 people who contracted Covid and then got hit by a bus?

 

That bus must have been going at quite some speed

 

You won't actually post a source for these claims though will you?

Thought not.

 

I don't know why the Governments of the world do what they do. As I asked in a previous post, "do you think governments tell us everything, or do you think they keep secrets?"

Perhaps it's as simple as having to justify the ridiculous projected mortality rates we were all fed at the start, to justify the draconian restrictions forced on us, and the destruction of people's businesses and lives.

You're clearly too dim to work this out for yourself, and I am growing tired of trying to explain these concepts to an idiot.

 

Go and find them for yourself, it's not very difficult.

 

You’re more than happy to completely ignore this irrefutable evidence though, as it doesn’t fit your chosen narrative.

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/07/15/tracking-covid-19-excess-deaths-across-countries

You have zero interest in the actual truth, merely trying to protect the position you’ve chosen to take on this issue, and with it, your precious and extremely fragile ego.

 

You're so predictable.