Medro, abstinence is 100% effective Couples who have abstained before coupling will be 100% safe I used them on girls from antrim I was safe not to use them afterwards Do smokers not believe smoking is bad for them because they continue to smoke? No they take a risk, unfortunately Africa has an extremley high risk of aids so what is safer? 100% or less than 100%? Oh and yes you are being racist, you assume millions of Africans will be saved due to what the pope says....I believe they have minds of their own and can do what they want.....the pope advises the best course even if it is more difficult If you don't want to get wet don't go out In the rain
As I understand it (I'm not a Catholic), the Catholic Church promotes 1 partner, get married, have a child, bring it up as a catholic and then die and go to heaven. Pretty simplistic summary of Catholism but hey! So, if you truely belive in the teachings of Cathol (thanks Eddie Izzard) then you should follow this and the Churches teaching to abstain until you find this partner (who has done the same), have sex to breed and all will be good... Now, if you decide that you don't want to follow the churches teachings/beliefs strictly and **** around then you should wear a condom - this is your personal responsibility. You go againt "your" churches teaching then be responsible. If you however go against these teachings and **** around without taking responsibility then take the consequences. If you don't follow religion, you still have personal responsibility not to be a **** and **** around by bagging it up ... but even then, folk don't and pass on STDs and Aids! Whose to blame .. themselves! Same rules apply whether you follow religion or not!
You actually said "Your argument suggests that Africans only do what the pope says. This suggests you think they are stupid" That is actually you making the assumption that people who believe in the words of the pope are stupid.
I don't believe you did. You talked about abstinence being a sure way of not passing on STDs. But you are ignoring the real life fact that people go their lives having more than 1 sexual partner. As you failed to answer my question, I'm guessing you included. He is held in high regard in places like Africa and you are only being naive to think that if he gave the nod to use condoms then millions of lives could be saved.
But the fact is ...abstinence is a sure way of not passing on STDs/Aids ... no matter what you believe! If you want to have numerous sexual partners then that is your choice but your choice should be to wear a condom! ****in hell !
What part of that childish comment did you find funny. Calling someone a spastic or calling someone an AIDS spreader?
Such high regard that people don't listen to his word about the sanctity of marriage? So people don't listen to him, but they would listen to him if he said that doing something they were gonna do anyway was ok? Med Dog....<shakes head> I can't stop you guessing about my personal situation Med Dog. I understand you are curious, but like I keep saying, it is entirely irrelevant to this discussion.
Be realistic, if you live in sub saharan africa where there is an aids pandemic, would you be ****ing about?
Fact is fact Medro...absitance is a 100% sure fire way not to get the AIds ... Even you cannot dispute that! If they do, then they need to go against the churches teachings and wear a condom as they are already going against it's teachings! It's simple .. **** all to do with the pope, he is preaching his version of the word of god/catholism, if you don't follow all if it then wear a ****in johnny!
I would say that this problem of AIDS cannot be overcome merely with money, necessary though it is. If there is no human dimension, if Africans do not help, the problem cannot be overcome by the distribution of prophylactics: on the contrary, they increase it. Pope Benedict Thats right the medicines make it worse.