So what you are saying is, Samuel who thinks smaller clubs like Newcastle should be able to spend/break the big 8 and stop the power the original 5 PL forming clubs have isn't worth reading? Interesting.
Is he? Not sure, bit like the people behind FIP. Are they wholesome and law abiding people, like the people at Leicester? Or not corrupt/funded by Russian Oil/Metals/Gas con men as we see with Chelsea, M City and Everton.... What about the other owners, the guys in at Liverpool - Henry is just a front for NESV, lots of others who invested and can be corrupt. Seems that something else is stopping nobody buying Newcastle, not just some corrupt PL and Keys(who has ****ing no influence) otherwise, why pass all the others and not this fictional TO
Maybe this is why he has not wanted to read it, it would put a line in the sand and make the good old barcodes want to stick well within FFP and have no such financed/skewed deals
yet here we are, all those dodgy/corrupt and faceless investors in the clubs I mentions....but ony FIP are the ones being stopped by the five PL founders/power clubs. Maybe its that Newcaslte were snitches on City that showed they coudln't be trusted with being the worlds richest club and not to also break the rules - forced to live by the moral standards they have set in place>?
so you are saying that the PL let corrupt owners takeover y he listed clubs but don’t want to pass this honest takeover?
You sound very bitter. I doubt one person has said that PIF are innocent. If you are @The emerald guard he is hoping that Amanda is not as innocent as she looks. And yes the PL did let the Southampton owner takeover despite his naughtiness. Also that wasn't the point of my original statement before you jumped aboard but hey ho!
Errrm. I just stated that the..... Chelsea, City and Everton deal we’re all less than clear. the Southampton guy is something you added. Strange that the PL is only interested in stopping Newcastle.
