It's nice to know that people are looking at deaths and % testing as some sort of competition. League tables and all. It stands to reason that "some" country will have the highest death rate and highest/lowest % testing of population. No ****ing wonder humanity is ****ed with this mind boggling take on things. "Yeah but we have less deaths than youse so that's reason to celebrate". **** me stupid! It's ****ing tragic.
I agree, none of that matters. What matters is people using bad maths to score points. And the people liking their fundamentally incorrect point scoring are even worse.
The comparison was not a total of tests of population, it was a comparison of tests per million people at a specific date I.e. it was the testing rate per million people . the chart stated tests per million people for the 4 constituent parts of the UK tests was 136k Scotland , as a separate part, accounted for 66k test per million people (of that Uk per million count of 136k) take away Scotland , rest of Uk rate would be approx 70k per million people . The post by some twitter non entity is flawed . If you then used the rate v total population of England then s course the total would be higher , probably 10 x higher .
That is not how the data was represented but if true then that would account for your seemingly terrible grasp of maths.
Just re-read, it states that the UK as a whole has tested at roughly double the rate that Scotland has. There is no ambiguity in the wording. If the information is false and you know this: fair enough.
Some of the so called great actors, just seem to turn up as themselves, Roger Moore for example, whereas the likes of Barker and David Jason can play a character without you constantly thinking of a different one they played. Pop Larkin and del Boy, Fletch and Arkwright etc.
