Still spelling Maori wrong, I see, Professor Pish. See previous Victoria University of Wellington' link to blow you out the water. Everything I have published about the Waitangi Tribunal was absolutely correct. Tell me which part you believe was wrong. Apart form telling me about the Waitangi treaty, you've told me absolutely nothing I didn't know. I'll give you the benefit of poor wording too, as NZ became independent in 1948, & it was 27 years later that the Tribunal was set up. But continuing to miss-spell Maori won't make it right. It's only you that miss-spells it. How long since you were over there? 300 years?
Hardly banter. Always the same format - he posts pish, I try to correct him, he ignore & ploughs his lone furrow, no matter what evidence is thrown at him! You do realise that you're talking absolute nonsense about this 'Mauri' thing, don't you. Professor Pish has either not followed the link I kindly offered him, or read it & continued to blurt out his pish in the hope I'll get fed up correcting him. He'll ignore you, no doubt, 'cos he's right. EDIT: Predictable. Just noticed that he's edited your post in his reply to make it appear that you agree with him. Typical. Pity for him that the very next post is Shaks replying to the self-same unedited version. Caught out in 2 posts. But I guess that'll be my fault, as John Wayne led the BLM 300 years ago in NZ, or some such nonsense.
What do you think you said about the Waitangi Tribunal that is right ? And I said the Waitangi Tribunal was set up after independence, do you think 75 comes before 48 ? No so it was set up after independence. The tribunal is a permanent commission of enquiry, so is not a law making commission, just makes recommendations for the government to decide on.
Oh dear, Professor Pish clearly in need of more education. If you had to use your remote control for channels other than footie & porn, you might find that there are countless documentaries available to watch, many of them covering history in some detail. I am an avid watcher. Indeed there are History channels around the world, and even National Geographic chimes in with regular worthy data. Perhaps your only grounding in US history is John Wayne movies, but mine most certainly isn't. You're very good at incorrect assumption, but absolutely awful at facts.
Just wondering if a truce could be called, going round in circles is making me dizzy, no one is going to give an inch, so it seems to be getting pointless.
You're now telling me what I told you about the Waitangi Tribunal!!!. And you clearly had no idea of the detail beforehand, going by your initial post on it. Has anyone explained to you that our exchange is still there in black & white?
It's easy, if you want the truth, read my posts. If you want to read unedifying, inaccurate pish riddled with lies & half-truths, read Chesh's. If you want it to stop, tell Chesh he's talking pish, though I warn you that Milky tried to & was rubbished too.
I didn't realise how good the ignore button could be. More so for my own protection, in case I lose it and really say something I regret...
No I don’t mate, I gave up reading his nonsense years ago, but see from the responses it’s the same old s****. I see nothing at all in him.
It is indeed good, could do with a (shut him up button as well) but can't do that yet, so will just ignore
Coming from someone who jumps on bandwagon with no left wheels and has blackjock as the driver. No wonder you both keep going around in circles.
You already do ignore all of the corrections that are necessary to prevent you believe the pish you (sadly) regularly spout. No change there then!
