And to use part of the speech by Ann Widdecombe, at the end of the video "There is a pattern consistent throughout history of oppressed people turning on the oppressors - slaves against their owners, the peasantry against the feudal barons, colonies... against their empires" PS You do see a lot more in these videos than I do. Where was the pilot and the information about the white statues of Jesus.
tut, tut, tut, you just admitted defeat, didn't you Jonny. I'm all for giving people a second chance, equal rights and all that. Take a look at how low BLM have made sky sports commentators cower, and beg for forgiveness (anything to keep their jobs), then look at the smirk on Micah's face, who's become nothing but a slave to the Marxist Communist BLM "it really does hurt him" you know. This is happening with all sports around the country, and soon the world if it ain't stopped. Now the backlash. American bikers for Trump, including the Hells Angels and *****ls were coming together to take Seattle back for the people, but the Mayor (who's obviously been told "or else") has said the Police will now take Seattle back. If the backlash happens in America, it will definitely happen here cos we are getting fed up with the bullshit BLM peddle and claiming saying white lives matter is racist.. If it's ok to say BLM, advertise BLM, write BLM everywhere, but saying, advertising and writing white lives matter is racist, can't you see this an attempt at white oppression by the Marxist communist organisation, can't you see that with all the chaos, destruction, burning, looting, killing and abolishing the police is designed to create division, divide and conquer and overthrow Governments so the dictative left can take over.......can't you see it.........Have you heard the Democrats condemn the radical riots yet. Can't you see how they go after celebrities sponsors when celebrities speak out against BLM, can't you see what's happening. Mark Levin is a well respected writer / journalist in the USA.
Gordon Bennett Eccers, sometimes you show yourself to be stupid, or trying very hard to play me............go do your research. Don't bother, I've got lots of bookmarks on my puter.......working it out yet? oh yeah, p/s, his name is Jake Hepple, I think everyone else saw it... if you need more links, which you always do, type Shaun King into youtube.
Look LL you are not being moderated by this forum, which is a shame as you are disruptive and quite frankly I find your posts defamatory, abusive, hateful, likely to offend and containing objectionable content if that's how you get your fix then that's fine but you're not including me. No, I'm not admitting defeat I just can't see any point in trying to have a rational discussion with you so play away and enjoy. PS The video said Jake Hepple was the person behind the banner not necessarily the pilot, although I admit he could have been. The Telegraph says it wasn't Hepple who was the pilot.
I read this earlier which had me nodding like a Churchill dog. I seldom make comments on social media anymore, but once again, the blatant bias of the BBC compels me to extol my opinion. Burnley football club were soundly beaten last night by Manchester City. Apparently, the players were overcome with detrimental emotions after a light aircraft, at the beginning of the match, flew over the stadium trailing a banner proclaiming "White lives matter!". So deeply impacted were they by another opinion, that they conceded five goals with none in return. Firstly I will say this to every professional footballer out there, if you wish to join the political arena, expect to be challenged. Your self righteous attitude will not be accepted by all. Secondly, you have absolutely no right whatsoever to bring your political beliefs, no matter from what doctrine, to the sport, and then impose, and attempt to indoctrinate the people who pay your salaries by foisting your views upon them. You are paid to play football, your supporters come to see football played, they do not come to see or hear political protests, no matter how just you may deem them to be. For many years, Celtic and Glasgow Rangers were, and rightly so, pilloried for bringing their religious beliefs to Scottish football, to the point where players of a denomination were not allowed to play for one team or the other. I am sick to the back teeth of being constantly lectured to, or subliminally influenced by both entertainment and news programmes on the television. Black lives matter is an organisation which preaches anarchy, don't believe me? Look at their ideology. In Britain, they have raised over a million pounds from just over 33 thousand people. Will this money be used to help those poor children we see every evening on television, dieing from pneumonia in Africa? Maybe it will be used to help free the black slaves still (yes, today) being bought and sold in the Sudan. Perhaps to pay for lawyers to appeal miscarriages of justice against black prisoners. Or, possibly to compensate ancestors of all those Union soldiers who died during the American civil war, giving their lives to win back freedom for so many impoverished and abused human beings made slaves of in the Americas. Perhaps the money will be used to bring lawsuits against the African Kings and Chieftains ancestors, who were responsible for capturing lesser tribes, dragging them in ropes to the Ivory coast and then placing them in foul compounds waiting for white owned ships to arrive so that the poor wretches could be sold into slavery. If Black lives really do matter to this insidious group, surely these are the things the money should be used for. Finally I have this for the BBC. Those poor Burnley players must have been so distressed, nay, even distraught, by the message from that aircraft. The poor little loves obviously couldn't cope with the sheer horror in the skies above, it must surely have been akin to the luftwaffe dropping bombs in the second world war. The BBC report and questions thrown at the Burnley players and manager, all prompted answers suggesting that this was the reason for their loss. STRANGE THEN, THAT THE NEUTRAL BBC DIDN'T MENTION THIS TO THE MANCHESTER CITY MANAGER, OR PLAYERS, WHO CLEARLY DIDN'T DIDN'T GIVE A F@%K AND BANGED IN 5 GOALS. To round off, by wearing the Black lives slogan across their backs, and kneeling in support of a political group, all clubs and players are actually breaking the football rules and regulations and should be punished. I would also urge that all supporters, no matter what your age or background, when you are finally allowed back into stadiums, if your team dare to inflict their political ideals on you, show your disdain by turning your backs on them for the whole game. Keep politics out of sport.
And this is how it works. I find it hilarious, ironic and so very disappointing that the only tolerance preached so often these days is that which fits within the boundaries prescribed by the new group think. Everything else ? Well you can just expect someone to claim they're offended and prepare yourself to receive the lash of the censor. If you disagree with the mantra then you will be judged as defamatory, hateful, abusive and likely to offend. There used to be a word to describe people who acted and thought in that manner, who wanted to control freedom of thought and expression.........ahhhh yes that was it, fascists. And we used to run them out of town.
Oh, so I'm not able to express a view? I clearly said it was my opinion. If my opinion offends you then please read no further.
Something I've said before Ringo, but never as eloquently put as this gentleman. I can't actually watch Sky Sports since it's become an extension of Sky news.
Interesting that that was the point you drew from it. Respectfully not agreeing with someones opinion is a world away from ' defamatory, hateful, abusive and likely to offend ' which serves an altogether different purpose. At the risk of repeating myself, it is how it works.
Eric I am speaking as a football fan, the whole BLM campaign is a political crusade and cash cow for the organisers supported by the media and the puppets they control, with the extreme left whispering in their ear every step of the way. They don't care about black gang members killing other black gang members in there thousands, they only care about the occasional corrupt/heavy handed/racist white cop that goes too far. Before the black slave trade there was a white slave trade, mainly Irish, my family tree is mainly of Irish descent perhaps I should start digging back in history so that I can become a 'victim' too, Irish Lives Matter will be my rallying call, I might make a few quid from the merchandise sales as well!!
I was going to set up a fund to fly a banner with, "IRISH POTATOES LIVES MATTER" over a football ground. Too soon
FFS, didn't you read the bit where I informed you that I had not said any of that pish? As well you know - but choose to ignore when it suits you - as accuser, it falls to you to you to provide proof. Even Captain Jackboot makes an effort (but ultimately fails, tbf). But you & I both know you won't find it, as I didn't say it, or even allude to it. ************ But going back to the original issue, I have provided conclusive proof that you contradicted yourself. I have provided both of the posts concerned, in their complete form (no edits) & not only emboldened the specific phrases, I've even coloured the contradiction in red & underlined it. I'm not sure what your other post is that you're talking about, but the contradiction remains a contradiction no matter what you post elsewhere. So which admission was the truthful one, and which one was the lie? Or perhaps you swing both ways? So, go on, big boy, admit it's a contradiction. There is no evidence for you to present on the matter - your submission is already there by your own hand, in its complete form & the contradiction is perfectly clear for all to see. Except you.
I gave up when it came to the Rangers & Celtic bit about religion. Didn't see any point in continuing, as he clearly hadn't fact-checked. It is only Rangers, in their history, who would not sign a Catholic. Celtic have ALWAYS signed players of any denomination. To say otherwise is not only plain wrong, it's actually defamatory, and has no link to the truth. He's clearly not aware that Jock Stein, for instance, was a Protestant, as was his long-serving captain, Danny McGrain. Did I hear someone mention Kenny Dalglish? Oh yes, another Protestant. In fact, there has always been a Protestant influence in the club. Influence - not just run-of-the-mill players. Before you say it, I'll remind you that my club is Partick Thistle, whose attitude to religion is the same as every other club but the Rangers of the past.
So the Green Brigade that claim to speak for all things Celtic embrace all things Protestant and British then Whitejock? So one thing you find not factually correct means everything else is dismissed?
Utter pish. Green Brigade? Since when did they ever make a signing for Celtic? Yes, if one thing is not fact-checked, why should I both ploughing through more pish that may or may not be true? Especially when it's such an easy fact-check. Clearly not written by a Scot, or anyone who knows about Scottish football. He's clearly heard a story somewhere & taken it as gospel. Fair enough, but you don't then publish it as truth. That's called libel. And it most certainly is in this case. So if I posted a 1000 word diatribe about something 'important', and spent the first couple of paragraphs authoritatively bemoaning the fact that all Millwall fans are *****philes who are watched 24x7 by Special Branch, would you continue to the 'important' bit? No, you'd (rightly) decry it as a load of pish & ignore it or slate it. Can you really tell me, hand on heart, that you'd read the rest of it expecting to read the truth? At best, you'd be guarded.
Perhaps the sectarian analogy was a poor example as only Rangers are guilty of sectarianism and Celtic were all for the inclusion of all. Although I read the second part to your answer I feel you went so far off the mark in order to deflect a minor flaw at the beginning of the piece I copied.Not a 'important' piece but stating a good(IMO) point.
FFS might as well talk to a brick. Now read this very slow, I said I don't accept any blame for colonialists 300 years ago, and I don't blame Africans for killing and eating missionarys, the indigenous people now have there lands back, and closure IMO, I wasn't talking about Jonny at this stage, unless he was an African who ate Missionarys. Now I mentioned Jonny later after a post he made about colonialists, I pointed out, that Colonialist American ancestors had stolen land, killed the indigenous people, and he himself still lived as a white colonialist on Indian land, so I didn't think he of all people should be slagging colonialists as he is one. If you don't understand even now, go back to bed and rest your brain.
