Walcott > Nani

Walcott
Minutes Played - 1419
Goals - 11
Assists - 7
Minutes Per Goal/Assist - 78.8

Nani
Minutes Played - 2260
Goals - 9
Assists - 12
Minutes Per Goal/Assist - 107.6

As proven above, Walcott is considerably better than Nani

 

You're going to get slated by the inbred Man Utd fans for stating the obvious.

 

One plays with Ronaldo and gets ahead of top quality wingers such as simou and quresma and the other well has little technical skill. Can't cross with either foot or shoot outside the box . One has ONLY pace but nothing more and is a mere finisher of the category of Darren Bent and should be converted into a striker because he is a useless winger who can't cross .

 

What you going to say next Lampard is better than Zidane because he scored more goals you gooners are quite deluded

 

Walcott - Minutes Per Goal/Assist - 78.8
Nani - Minutes Per Goal/Assist - 107.6

Nani is very ineffective. Even Arshavin in poor form is more effective than him. Mind, so is Victor Obinna

 

There's only one here who's deluded here and the only one wumming the Arsenal board.

please log in to view this image

 

Ok lol he is SO ineffective that your own manager could not resist giving him praise, well after the bashing he has given Arsenal I am not surprised its quite funny how the most stuck up manager can give a player with great talent praise whilst fickle gooners can't. Well I guess half a decade of nout can do that to football fans.

 

Does your mummy know you're up late playing on a computer when you've got school in the morning ?

 

Batmanu loves stats but Batmanu do you believe Lampard is a better player than Zidane?

 

He gave Gary Neville praise too. Not sure if that's such a good thing

 

Oh its LuisNani17 with his very poor "Why are gooners so deluded thread".

 

Sorry guys I am very tired and have school in the morning. Need to go there 8.30 sharp as I don't want to be tired . Good night chums and bye xxxxx

 

I actually like Walcott. Sure, he isn't the best technical player around but he is effective and is difficult to stop in full flow. It's obviously harder to maintain that average over a longer period of games and Walcott has been "rested" for more difficult tests at times so I think these stats are unfair on Nani. I think Arsenal fans should be firing out RVP's stats moreso because they really are impressive.

I remember commenting on a thread on the Arsenal board a couple of months ago where some were saying RVP could never be a talisman. I defended him and said that he could, should he stay fit. He is a cracking player but the problem is that if you have a history of injuries up to that age, they are unlikely to go away. Still a class act when he gets a run of games though.

PS. I am aware that this thread was designed to lure in United fans but I'm far too clever to get lur....

 

Before I get my well earned sleep here is a stat for gooners since 1990

Man Utd 11 premier leagues Arsenal 3

And to finish off

Man Utd > Arsenal

Good night and Good bye

 

Remember not to put your hands down your pyjama bottoms.You'll only make a sticky mess

 

Oh i see LuisNani17, You lose the debate ove walcott v nani, so you have to change topic.

 

I dont think walcottt has the brain nor the talent to be a top class player.

But he has improved a lot this year and is defo better than gibson and obertan.

He is good, but for me relies on his pace too much and cant cross a ball well enough, a lot like lennon.