So J K Rowling has got herself in trouble with her comments aimed at transsexuals. Now all of a sudden she's trying to deflect attention by telling us how she was the alleged victim of domestic abuse and mysoginy. Maybe she's speaking the truth but it all seems a bit convenient to come out with this decades after it allegedly happened to appease those that know she is a sexist man hater.
Her anti-trans comments smack of jealousy for me. Who would you rather fk? please log in to view this image OR please log in to view this image please log in to view this image
She reacted to some twerp commenting on "people that menstruate" or summat and when the transnazis took to Twitter calling her transphobic and the accompanying hatred that usually ensues she had to get on the back foot. Jonathan Ross came out in support for JK but later retracted this after he was woke by his kids. The comments he got from the trans-supporting community jumped straight into abuse referring to him not being able to pronounce his R's, so it is not ok to say anything negative about trannies but absolutely acceptable to mock someone for their speech impediment. Difference between the two is trannies decide to be trannies, folks with speech impediments don't have a choice. Once again drag queens are being held in higher esteem than real people. Mr The Chaser's reply to the OP sums this up. The Trans movement is nothing other than pornography. Might just as well have the Japs pissing on an octopus movement.
