I'm not disagreeing but I do find this puzzling tbh.
Why would these people 'loan' £10 million with no interest charges?
And why would they put themselves in a position where they could wake up, one morning, owning a club they have no interest in owning?
Wouldn't it be much easier not to loan the club money?
And I think that's what's causing all this confusion - that and what Donald said on Radio Newcastle. I agree with you - why would multi-billionaires from a country that have a passing interest in football loan a club around £10 million without charging interest but with clauses in that state no-one can buy the club without them agreeing? Hopefully for the sake of the club, this all plays out positively and soon.