I don't know why the Israelies don't just give the Palastinians there own State then just bomb the ****ing **** out of it
Ten official United States investigations and three official Israeli inquiries have all conclusively established the attack was a tragic mistake. But please don't let trifiling facts like these get in the way of a good conspiracy theory.
What conclusion did you expect them to reach. As was stated, the conclusions of the enquiries would have been decided before any investigation had taken place.
I have provided alot of information to back my point, you provide none and just resort to calling people loons. Drone much?
Your original copy & paste first post in the thread only mentions one official American investigation. There were nine subsequent ones over the years, along with three Israeli inquiries . All 14 reports came to exactly the same conclusion - that it was a tragic mistake. Yet both Islamists and their bedfellows from the Loony Left keep dragging this tragic incident up time after time, just as you have done today. Investigation Date Conclusion U.S. Navy Court of Inquiry June 10-18, 1967 The attack was a case of mistaken identity. Calm conditions and slow ship speed may have made American flag difficult to identify. No indication the attack was intended against U.S. ship. CIA Report June 13, 1967 The attack was not made in malice and was a mistake. Joint Chiefs of Staff Fact Finding Team (Russ Report) June 9-20, 1967 Outlined "findings of fact," bud did not make any findings about the actual attack. Clifford Report July 18, 1967 No premeditation, but "inexcusable failures" by Israeli forces constituing "gross negligence." Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 1967 Secretary of Defense McNamara testified he supported conclusion that the attack was not intentional. Senate Armed Services Committee Feb. 1, 1968 No conclusion. Secretary McNamara makes comparison of attack on Liberty to that on Pueblo with regard to uncertainty about what was happening at the time of the incident. House Appropriations Committee April-May 1968 Navy communications "foulup" and no conclusion regarding Israeli actions. Much of report remains classified. House Armed Services Committee May 10, 1971 Critical of Navy communications, no conclusion regarding Israeli actions. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence 1979 Responding to critical book by Liberty crewman James Ennes, Senate investigation found no merit to his claim attack was intentional. National Security Agency 1981 Liberty was mistaken for an Egyptian ship as a result of miscalculations and egregious errors. House Armed Services Committee June 1991 Responding to request from Liberty Veterans Association, Subcommitte on Investigations launched probe that concluded there was no evidence to support allegations made by the Association and no reason for further investigation.
Of course they wouldn't, my god man! Why would Israel admit an intentional attack? In fact a lot of them reports come to "no conclusion" while they are kept classified, hmm
Don't forget he has mates in the Army too. He has 7 kids. He's a Muslim. He's a loonball. One of those statements is true.
Some good points made on here lads, but you seem to have forgotten the fine job Israel are doing of oppressing Palastein. A wonderful job and saving the World from having to deal with another Country of ****wits where the Government officials will drive gold plated BMWs but we'll still have to give foreign aid to.
Why would they admit to an "Intentional attack" it if it was just a tragic Friendly Fire accident (in the midst of a War)? The Day before this attack Israeli Pilots bombed their own men by accident so what are we to infer from that? Is that proof of some conspiracy? Besides what possible reason would all the US Top Brass have for accepting that the Israeli attack was an accident? Why would they not come out and say it was "Intentional"? Were they part of some long-term plan to make the Arabs look bad?
