Off Topic SARS-CoV-2 Covid-19

Shandy-arse. Just saying

 

Don’t know about Morrison’s, that’s a new one on me, but the deliveries from the Govt contract or from Councils are for people who’re shielding so shouldn’t even leave there house for exercise
They’ll be in.

 

some special people in this country of ours

 

It’s in the Daily Mail ffs

 

So, is it not true?

 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/hospitals-knew-elderly-patients-coronavirus-22001069

apols - forgot some people only read the Mirror - arf

 

He’s allowed an opinion. There’s far too much negativity going on if anyone dares to have a differing opinion to the ones that the mainstream media are telling them to have. As each day goes by I’m getting more and more ****ed off with society!

 

YouTube etc don't agree re David ikle, as bonkers as his opinion was/is....it was his opinion! Sol is basically saying it's a man made virus targeting black people.... Which is bonkers

 

You’re on a definite loser with me here, you’ll never convince me that any individual isn’t allowed to voice his or her opinion, Icke, Campbell or whoever.

Youtube is owned by Google, Google is owned by Bill Gates, Bill Gates is developing a vaccine, you do the math(s).

 

he's allowed an opinion but I aren't - arf - the irony

 

My opinions are that seven is three, that swans are fish and that Italians are reasonable people.


You're confusing opinion with utter bollocks, I'm afraid.

 

I never said people can't have an opinion, far from it, no matter how much of a tool it makes them look!

Just saying YouTube etc don't agree!

 

It could be a man made virus, and black people do seem to be disproportionately affected. Sol's just added 2 and 2 and made 7.

 

More like 77! It's a ridiculous claim and based on his previous comments and claims it's his go to reason for everything

 

WRITTEN BY Dr John Lee, who is a recently retired professor of pathology and a former NHS consultant pathologist.
Ten reasons to end the lockdown now. (He explains his argument for each point in the linked article)

1. You cannot understand the significance of this virus simply by looking at the raw death figures.
2. The policy response to the virus has been driven by modelling of Covid – not other factors.
3. We don’t know if lockdown is working.
4. We should ease the lockdown to save lives.
5. Lockdown is not sustainable.
6. Lockdown directly harms those most likely to be affected by coronavirus.
7. Lockdown directly harms those who will be largely unaffected by coronavirus.
8. The health service has not been overwhelmed nor likely to be.
9. The virus is almost certainly not a constant threat.
10. People can be trusted to behave sensibly.


https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/ten-reasons-to-end-the-lockdown-now

 

More evidence that the virus has been here for longer than initially thought - suspected cases in Bradford in January:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-52589449

 

Some interesting views, and some points which seem valid, although rather spoilt by some ‘facts’ he’s quoting without any apparent basis, such as “around 99.9 per cent of those who catch the disease recover.” He is also using other info incorrectly such as saying there was an ‘assumption’ that 80% of the population would get infected. As far I’m aware 80% was a ‘worse case scenario’ not an assumption.
As ever the truth will be somewhere in the middle

 

My employer has been volunteering staff to deliver food parcels and prescription medication to vulnerable people for about 8 weeks now. I've been part of the project and delivered stuff myself for the Smile Foundation. We've been working out of Haltemprice and Beverley Sports Centres. It's quite a nice feeling taking a delivery to an old person or a family who is struggling.