I, myself tend to subscribe to this theory. It would account for the historical anachronsims that have been so prevalent in life on Earth. It's a theory though so I may be correct BUT i may be wrong. That's the thing about theories though. I don't think mine is any less relevant than an omnipotent God or a big bang that banged for some reason that no ****er can prove happened.
Von Daniken was caught falsifying evidence, so we can dismiss his theories out of hand as nothing more than a scam to sell his books to a credulous public.
Sterotypist have you ever been nice to anyone? People who are nasty generally are very low on self confidence
If the good people at CERNS master time travel, i doubt they would travel back to pork Mary .....Scientists are too boring
It's a theory supoorted by the most flimsy evidence and huge assumptions. I'd never claim that something I couldn't possibly know is true or untrue but to believe this theory is no different to believing in any religion.
There is scientific evidence for an expanding universe which supports the big bang theory. There is no scientific evidence for the theory that ancient people were visited by aliens or that there is such a thing as god.
