Coronavirus

So you agree they got better signal coverage

P.s. I had a Phillips bad boy like this for my first phone with an antenna that could be pulled out for better signal haha. Everyone else was on Nokia’s by that point and I remember someone trying to mug me and choosing he didn’t want the phone

 

Analogue always was a better signal, I never ever said otherwise, you make too many assumptions my friend. All I wanted was data evidence to support it. And btw, I couldn't find any either

 

My 1st phone

please log in to view this image

 

Back in the days when you never used to have to register a phone eh Sucky. You just topped it up from a card bought at a shop. I think, not sure, that all changed after a few terror attacks, can't remember specifically which ones. Because those phones, you could just lose, they might know who sold it, and what calls were made, but they never knew who purchased or used it.

 

You can still get burner phones easy enough

 

I notice aberdude disappears when challenged to actual put together a coherent response rather than just spam random YouTube videos. Standard.

 

Emerson was never there was he? Kept ****ing off back to Brazil because his missus hated NE England iirc

 

Tbph I never realised. Obviously do now, just googled it when you said.

 

I had one of the original NEC car phones. At the time you could buy fake ones and people would actually fit them

 

I don’t have a problem with learning for myself...delving a bit deeper. It’s always ****s like you who take everything from Fiona Bruce who need to be proven with substantial evidence...however the problem and ignorance is yours not mine mate.

Bet you still think building 7 collapsed due to collateral damage...makes sense for a limited box. Me....I’m more than happy to believe that it was destroyed to kill the paper trail of the missing trillions and let’s not forget it went down in front of our own eyes in a controlled demolition.

You see that one act? That’s enough to make me question everything that was said...then you look deeper...that depends on you though.

but you hang in there...if it’s not a Fiona it might have been Trevor but between them...I’m sure they banged it into your head what you should carry in your thoughts forever.

you haven’t really given me evidence...you’ve just told me what you think due to your mental parameters and their limits and said things like...’there is substantial evidence’. That’s like sitting next someone who uses words to display their know how...like a manager or some useless **** like that at work...y get me?

 

Thing I used to hate with phones fitted in company cars, you'd call a mate and during the convo you've just driven pass your motorway exit

 

I think it was him who was sold the NE because the club assured him it was close to London.

 

Green screen burner for work

A "Basher used to be a phone that had some kinda glitch where you could make unlimited free calls (before that was the norm) you used to have to turn them off when not using them though as networks would cut them off. Not sure how it worked tbh but I had a few. one I had for about 2 years til it cut off

 

Too many words bruv, just use one word...'analogue' that normally fooks with their head

 

Dont forget the fbi seizing all private commercial cctv from the surrounding areas of the attacks within hours. Particularly the pentagon missile attack.

 

So ignore that I’ve shown there is plenty of evidence against the idea that phones couldn’t have been used to make calls. And that it would be pointless to fake them anyway, even if you question if they could have, as the passengers had access to airphones on the plane at every seat, therefor making faking mobile calls absolutely pointless if it was a coverup. And move onto a completely new point. Absolutely typical of a conspiracy theorist.

Then make sure you add some “that’s your ignorance not mine” type comments and insults for good measure to complete the conspiracy theorist full house.

Question: what is your theory? What actually happened? There’s so many different conspiracy theories around 9/11 that I’d like to know which you believe is correct?

 

And the change to the world trade centers insurance policy weeks before the attack.

 

You know me from before so it seems.... Sorry if I've missed your sock change...... I've never needed too wear them myself...i post lots and very little gets looked at.....not my issue and neither do I care

 

Afaik it was explained that they thought the building was in danger of going down and that was lost in translation before being reported. Pretty standard for incorrect info to float around during an event, it happens with most mass shootings or terror attacks during the confusion. Don’t think as a stand alone point it proves anything.