Both. Soul definately exists, though it's heyday was the 1970s. Brit artists like Plan B and Adelle are pretty soulful, though purists might argue that they're the wrong colour.
you really are a ****wit. where have I denied climate change? does asking a question = assertion? if a term exists, and is used why is it stupid? youre telling me to read yet have difficulty understanding abiogenesis. define abiogenesis? what has the sentence 'elements' of evolution are proven, not ALL of evolution. hence its still a 'theory', have to with the definition of scientific theory? are you suggesting the notion of evolution as a concept belongs to darwin? try reading what is ****ing in front of you, you thick **** 'put simply and for example purposes only, evolution as growth/development proven. monkey to man not proven'
You're a total moron. I won't go into all of your glaring mistakes, as you obviously can't read properly, so I'll just keep it simple. Evolution is a fact and a theory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_as_theory_and_fact Monkey to man is not what evolution suggests is true. Once you've digested those two facts, you can post more bullshit and repeat the same old crap, without having addressed any of your errors.
of course you wont, because youre allegations cannot be substantiated. ie youre full of **** you allowed youre anger/bias/inability to understand/comprehend to make untrue statements so youre source is wiki? lets agree with this for the moment evolution is a fact - i said 'evolution as growth/development proven' evolution is theory - i said 'monkey to man not proven' now i clearly stated that i was 'putting it simply' and for example purposes only (what is it with you and only reading bits?) and are you suggesting charlie boy didnt say that we evolved as a species from apes in a process known as natural selection
My source isn't Wikipedia. I posted something simple, as I thought that you could understand it. Apparently you still didn't or you're too scared to read it. Darwin suggested the model. It's been refined since. What part of the evolution from apes to man do you think is flawed?
so monkey to man is a simplistic way to put it? a lot of darwinism has been refined, evolved if you will whats flawed is the lack of 'evidence' and the 'making things fit'.
I thought that you hadn't read it as you kept offering the exact same, flawed argument, TFWNN. What part of man's evolution do you believe is lacking in evidence?
The thing is that humans have the ability to apply the most outlandish theories to explain the unexplainable. What people are probably seeing is hallucinations brought about by strong emotional reflexes affecting chemical signals to the brain. But people don't want to hear that. It's comforting to them to attribute such sights as near death experiences and/or religious experiences.
i dont see why you find it hard to grasp tbh. evoluton is about development/growth/adaptation etc abiogenesis is how life began/created etc no life = nothing to evolve. its that simple. evolution cannot exist without some form of abiogenesis, as i said. i did not offer religious/scientific arguements/beliefs for this. simply that life had to exist first as for mans evolution there is no 'overwhelming' evidence of ape ancestory imo. too many ifs buts and maybe's
When a person dies he becomes worm food. The whole concept of "soul" is ancient, obsolete, superstitious garbage. I find it funny how some people are so full of themselves they think they are immortal. A man is just a slightly more civilised version of an ape, that's all. Stop thinking you are so special
Agree, the only thing that annoys me is that how can we state that we are the only life in this universe, out of all the planets its just Earth with life, garbage imo... has to be other forms of life out there..
It exists I have saw it It is terrible I would advise against it Those struggling financially may be lucky enough to avoid it I will never get that time back Liam Neesons worst movie
Abiogenesis is a specific theory about the origins of life, TFWNN. There are many alternatives to it, including the seeding of life on this planet from others or various theistic creation stories. There's absolutely tons of evidence for the evolution of man from a great ape ancestor. From the genetic to the archaeological, from the fossil record to dental records, there's just an almost endless amount. What part/s of that are you questioning?
