hes made some people on here look VERY stupid, saying hes not a goalscorer. i had countless arguments with that que somma (shaun mitchell) guy on the bbc 606 about it and im glad rossy is proving me right
i said it when keogh first come and i stand by it. He will be keeping becchio out of the team for a while and i think we'll sign him in january
Having interchangeable Becchio & Keogh can only be a good thing. Becchio runs his socks off, covers loads of ground and often looks knackered as a result. If he can be kept fresh through being subbed/subbing for Keogh then thats bad news for defenders. It might stop the team losing its shape when he goes off too.
Josh, what formation do you think we've been playing recently? 442, whilst not ideal given the parlous state of our defence does at least ensure we continue to score plenty. If SG ever gets the back 4 doing what they're paid to do, we'll take a lot of stopping this season. 3 goals away from home against a decent side was no mean achievement
Not a chance, Becchio will start alongside McCormack next game Keough on the bench, if not next game certainly the following one.
I disagree. Becchio didnt do as well when he came on against brighton as keogh did while he was on so i think it'd be unfair to replace him there. And to be honest he is far better in many ways than becchio and i think he works better with Mccormack. I agree Keogh wouldnt score as many goals as becchio but i think we will play better with keogh in the team or certainly mccormack does