A racing incident requires both drivers to be at fault in my view. Hamilton may not have done anything deliberately malicious or dangerous but the collision was his fault and his alone.
I completely agree that it was his fault and his alone. But I don't think it is severe enough for a penalty. I want to rewind 10 years in the rule book. It is not fun watching boule racers.
Well, Eddie Jordan's just said if Hamilton was penalisated then Schumacher should have been, too, so that puts that argument to bed. If EJ says it, it must be bollocks.
He also said that the Rosberg/Perez incident was the same as the Hamilton/Massa incident even though Hamilton gave Massa a puncture and Rosberg to bumped wheels with Perez.
Well that singapore grand prix was far from dull!! I'd love to know how many overtakes hamilton pulled off today (not including his 1st on Massa) It was good that McLaren were trying to beat Red-Bull at the end onstead of just cruising
Was really impressed with the force Indias today, they had mixed strategies and managed to get well up with both cars.
I don;t like all these silly penalties for racing incidents, but agree with allsaint, if you do something thatis seen as warranting a penalty then the penalty should be given, irrelevant of whether the driver in question went out or not. I also think people given grid place penalties that only go back, say, 2 places, should have those remaining 3 held 'in lieu' until all 5 have been served. Bando, my humblest apologies, I just wondered is all, he probably disappeared up his own backside.
As a positive, DRS worked better than I thought it would but, as has been most of the races this year, the tyres did a little bit more to encourage overtaking. Once again, KERS played a bit of an unsung role.
Wow! what a comment by massa to Lewis, that was cringe worthy and very uncomfortable to witness. Roll on Japan lol
