Off Topic SARS-CoV-2 Covid-19

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Carmine Galante. said:
You wouldn’t pay him in washers.

No common sense, no grasp of the situation, no communication skills, shocking decision making ( lack of )ability and to top it off a total lack of knowledge when it comes to the law.
Just what you need when you’re a Sergeant in the Old Bill!!

Total clown shoe.
Click to expand...
I think the trouble in a lot of jobs is people are good at passing interviews but it’s known they’re **** at the job but still get it
 
DMD said:
The fact he thought that was acceptable in the first place, and had still made the rank of sergeant speaks volumes on the attitude and recruitment policies of them as an organisation. They covered their arses by saying he'd had a talking to, but someone that has reached that level should never of had the actions he carried out in his mind in the first place. It's not an isolated incident either.

They really are in danger of ****ing up the good will that is essential for maintaining the current restrictions on movement. They Police with consent, and are simply members of the public in uniform, and I think as an organisation they need reminding of that, rather than this apparent perception that they are the law or a paramilitary force.
Click to expand...
Great thread on why following the law, not Govt announcements, is important

You must log in or register to see media
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
dennisboothstash said:
Great thread on why following the law, not Govt announcements, is important

You must log in or register to see media
Click to expand...

The shame is that any of that needed explaining to plod in the first place, especially as much will have been under the instruction of senior officers.

It really does demonstrate their attitude regarding the dynamic between 'them' and us 'civilians' as they like to describe us, without considering the implications of that.
 
fcuking lowlifes idea of fun - going round HRI car park spitting on car door handles
apparently they've caught those responsible

Sometimes i think we as a race deserve this virus

We're not very good are we?
 
chillo said:
fcuking lowlifes idea of fun - going round HRI car park spitting on car door handles
apparently they've caught those responsible

Sometimes i think we as a race deserve this virus

We're not very good are we?
Click to expand...

The majority are.

****s is ****s though.


Difference is in times of crisis we need to come down hard on ****s.

Take the ****ers out of circulation.


That'll learn 'em.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kempton, BlackAndAmberGambler and look_back_in_amber
I’ve just readed that the UK death toll is wholly unreliable. Different NHS trusts are reporting in different time frames, some report once every few days, some are consistently a day behind etc. but whenever they finally get reported they all go into that days announced figures regardless of when the deaths actually occurred, which explains the big daily fluctuations.

On top of which no community deaths at home, care homes and so on, have been reported and some estimate this could be as many as 25% of the hospital deaths. The true death toll is higher than we know anyway.

For anyone interested.
 
Mr Hacker said:
I’ve just readed that the UK death toll is wholly unreliable. Different NHS trusts are reporting in different time frames, some report once every few days, some are consistently a day behind etc. but whenever they finally get reported they all go into that days announced figures regardless of when the deaths actually occurred, which explains the big daily fluctuations.

On top of which no community deaths at home, care homes and so on, have been reported and some estimate this could be as many as 25% of the hospital deaths. The true death toll is higher than we know anyway.

For anyone interested.
Click to expand...

I'm probably just thick, but I can't get my head around the official figures. It seems to imply there's 11 people in HRI.

What am I missing?

https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/f94c3c90da5b4e9f9a0b19484dd4bb14
 
askewshair said:
So contrary to government guidance,
  • sec 7 states that two people not from the same household ARE able to meet.
  • Sec6 b dictates that we can take exercise alone or with other members of the same household (not just one other member).
Click to expand...

My favorite is section three, because it uses the word "appurtenance" which I'm now going to google. <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: dennisboothstash and Ron Burguvdy
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back