you know i am not one for swearing but fook off with the denier shoite Look at what i am saying the notion of israel has been around since 1800's, put in place in 1917 by Balfour et al. so to say it was a direct result of WW2 or the holocaust is rubbish as for treblinka A detailed forensic examination of the site of the wartime Treblinka camp, using sophisticated electronic ground radar, has found no evidence of mass graves there. For six days in October 1999, an Australian team headed by Richard Krege, a qualified electronics engineer, carried out an examination of the soil at the site of the former Treblinka II camp in Poland, where, Holocaust historians say, more than half a million Jews were put to death in gas chambers and then buried in mass graves. krege, although asking for more work to be carried out in harmony with other agencies, believes no extermination took place there.
Wait a ****in minute. Holocaust denier? Isn't denier a measurement of the strength/quality of women's tights? So, they had holocaust tights, presumably to be worn to the holocaust? Wow. You learn summat new every day.
The notion of Israel has been around since about 2,000 BC. The Jews believe that the land was promised to them by god. It's not a modern concept. You do realise that you're quoting from a neo-Nazi Holocaust denial site, don't you? Krege, an air-traffic controller, has admitted that he failed to scan at least one area where a mass grave was photographed from the air. His work was funded by the Adelaide Institute, a group that deny the holocaust and, possibly even more bizarrely, AIDS. No. I didn't suggest that there was anything negative about being bisexual, did I? You, on the other hand, don't agree, do you? Decided whether homosexuals should be stoned to death or not, yet?
as i said and you are unable to grasp, I dont think stoing is the prescribed punishment for homosexuality am waiting for you to shed some light on the subject, as you seem to be in the know
What 'true scripture/records' would those be, then? I was going by the Torah/Bible. It's quite explicit in promising the land to the Israelites. Possibly because it's a claim made by someone with absolutely no work in that field, who is also allied to a neo-Nazi propaganda machine who deny that AIDS exists. Why would anyone take that seriously, as opposed to the evidence to the contrary? Any other parts of the Holocaust that you don't agree with? I didn't say that stoning was the prescribed punishment for homosexuality under Sharia. As there seems to be some disagreement about this amongst Islamic nations, I doubt that I'd be able to settle it. What would you suggest that the punishment should be?
I'm bored of this ****, constantly feel like this poor guy reading all this ----> Would any of you care for some Nigerian Music?? [video=youtube;ZprNwUFCHpM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZprNwUFCHpM[/video]
The bravest people in the world are animators. Bet none of you knew that. You know why? because animators push boundaries, mock that which cannot be mocked and see everything as equal. the likes of Family Guy, South Park, Danish cartoonist and others around the world. So ask yourselves this question. In 2011, with all the advances we have made...WHY THE **** ARE PEOPLE WHO DOODLE THE ONLY SANE ****ERS ABOUT?
Didn't they give up any claims to an inheritance when they were freed, under the law? What would be the point in god's promise to Abraham to make Ishmael a nation too, otherwise? I'm talking hypothetically here, of course. Krege's an air-traffic controller. I don't think that anyone's really going to take him seriously in a completely different area of expertise, especially when you consider where he got his funding from. Should the UN investigate every single claim against the Holocaust? What evidence? The aerial photography, for a start, documentary evidence, personal testimony, plus the fact that the Nazi commandant admitted it at trial. I haven't read them, so I wouldn't know what they say or don't say about the Holocaust. He did talk about it in a public broadcast in November 1941, though: "None has suffered more cruelly than the Jew the unspeakable evils wrought upon the bodies and spirits of men by Hitler and his vile regime. The Jew bore the brunt of the Nazi's first onslaught upon the citadels of freedom and human dignity. He has borne and continued to bear a burden that might have seen beyond endurance. He has not allowed it to break his spirit; he has never lost the will to resist. Assuredly in the day of victory the Jew's suffering and his part in the struggle will not be forgotten." What about Iran? I believe that the method of death is decided by the judge, though. And what is prescribed? You appear to be avoiding the question. Again.
Ironically, on Question Time tonight they have just discussed the death penalty and are now discussing whether Palestine should be allowed to join the UN!
how is not knowing avoiding the question? you seem to find things were there isnt anything, make it up if you will
why is that ironic? or funny? I was not suprised that the palestine story has lost its kudos with the BBC. and QT left it till second to last. seems the brits recognise a palestinian state as for the death peanlty, that too was news. shame they dont see a problem with the justice system with regards to wrongful imprisonment and se that as an excuse/reason to not discuss the death penalty properly
