“Those of you who read some of my posts last night may have deduced I'm running out of patience with Radrizani. To be honest I don't care about players missing chances, or making mistakes as that's just football. Obviously I'd prefer they didn't but I truly believe they are all giving the absolute maximum. Mr Radrizani however, is not giving the maximum...maybe it's all going on behind the scenes and I'll owe him an apology in a few days. To be honest the bare minimum he has to fund is a striker, proven at our level or above. Obviously not easy to achieve in the January window but with only one striker atthe club it's not even open to debate isit ?” .... I’m sure he appreciates your 100% support
What will any players looking in see, that fans think 1 striker at a football club isn't enough, well as the other 91 football clubs have more than one striker, it seems fair enough to me. Will they see Bamford doesn't score enough goals, well I think even Bamford would agree with that, so Where's the problem.
I think that's fair. Encouraging him to do more and then setting realistic targets is 100% support. Whether he retains that support wil depend on the remainder of the transfer window...we have lost 2 first team players and they absolutely must be replaced.
Maybe when he was raking in the £30 million in, in the summer he should have maybe thought I've just sold our top striker, maybe we should buy another instead of just loaning an unproven kid.
Not possible. Don't you know under FFP we have to sell anything with value every season and replace with 16 year olds or loanees. After all, isn't that what the properly run clubs do
I’m not claiming there is a problem mate I’ve stuck up for Rads loads, last season a foolish mistake, this season unforgivable if we don’t strengthen
So it’s encouraging to do more when you ask the questions but unnecessary negativity when others do it
WJ get someone who can read, to read you his whole post and not just the first line, then you won't look as stupid as you do now.
He went on a rant, saying I was lying and making things up, and then read the rest of the post and seen he was talking ****, so deleted his post.
Rant my arse. That's your department. I simply asked you to identify the post from which you were quoting, as I couldn't find it. I gave the post number from which I quoted & asked you to do the same. Then having posted, I read the next post & found Milky had done your job for you, so decided that my post was not necessary. Only you have now made it necessary. Happy now? Over to Doc ...
A long winded post to say you fooked up and got it wrong, again. If you had read the post properly you wouldn't need me and Milky to correct you all the time. You told me to go back and read the posts, if you had done that yourself instead of telling everyone else to do it, you could have saved a lot of trouble.
I think what a few of these posts have shown us is we are all getting a bit nervous and edgy that we are going to screw this up for a second year running. I hope Bielsa and the players are keeping calmer than us fans because the ride is certainly less enjoyable at the moment
You clearly have a problem reading my posts, as I stated quite clearly that I did go back & read the posts. Did you miss that bit? Oh no, you didn't, did you. It just so happens that I referred back to find post #48, the original post that sparked the discussion. I was not aware that there was a second statement, hence I missed it. And I thank Milky for quoting & highlighting the other post for me to find. So, he corrected me, not you. You spout so much shiite that your 'factual' posts should be ignored unless substantiated with a quote, link or whatever. But you don't, by habit, and the reason is that you know fine well that you're spouting much shiite.
You didn't though did you, it was the same post, if you had read all the post you wouldn't have made such a fool of yourself would you lots of waffle no substance. You were wrong,I was right, again that's all you need to know.
