And Corbyn used Russian hackers allegedly to get hold of the US trade talks papers,Putins man in London, no wonder he will refuse to nuke Russia in a war.
I don't know, these little Windrush scamps eh, get a little bit boisterous now and again, still, they love their grandma and go to church every week
You really need to get out more, her "kid" is in his late twenties, nothing to do with Windrush and sure if, as it sounds, he broke the law then he does time. Is it his mothers fault? Is it the Queens fault that her son is accused of stuff or your fault that OLOF got a speeding ticket?
Aussie convict in criminal excuses scandal, wait for it, it will be victimisation because he's Black, the copper forced his hand in his mouth etc.
Yes always interesting to see a bit of cringing hypocrisy. Beardy boy was probably the most cringeworthy thing in it though. Exceptionally self satsified. Corbyn is in my opinion, a tosser. But really.... writing a forward to a well-known work from over 100 years ago that contained some anti-Semetic references is hardly evidence he’s anti-Semetic himself. If a film reviewer comments favourably on old classic ‘reach for the sky’ is he racist because of what Douglas bader called his dog? Here’s a balanced piece on Corbyn’s ‘anti-semetism’ from that lefty rag the spectator. Written by a Jewish writer who has been critical of the Labour Party. https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2019/05/is-jeremy-corbyn-really-anti-semitic/ To some any criticism of Israeli foreign policy or domestic policy is anti-Semetic. To some anti-zionism is anti-Semetic. There’s a lot of no-go areas if you want to comment on international politics without offending someone. Corbyn’s error here is he should have fronted this debate out ages ago, owned it and moved on... he didn’t.
The point of it was though the hypocrisy. When they were given the examples of anti-Semitism they all assumed Johnson was responsible and they all said it would make him unfit to be leader. When beardy boy then told them it was in fact Corbyn they were made to look even more stupid than they actually are. They'd condemned as unfit to lead the very person they were supporting.
see my first sentence. I don’t argue with you, though not all of them squirmed. not much different to people coming on here consistently slating one side... and ignoring identical behaviour from ‘their guys’ I of course am a paragon of objectivity as I slag all of the hypocritical, lying, self-serving cumquats
When it comes to the issue of anti-Semitism within the Labour Party I take on board the views of those affected by it. So when the Jewish Labour Movement themselves say the problem is rife within the Labour Party and hasn't been dealt with I'm inclined to believe them.
kind of proving my point there. All labour members and people are left wing lying scum according to you... except when you can use them to support an argument.
They are left wing lying scum when it comes to their bullshit policies, but when Jewish Labour voters go against their own Party and say they’re anti-Semitic then I’d say their opinion is believable.
A bit like that left wing idiot Andy McDonald on politics live this week, saying you can't believe Trump when he says the NHS is not on the table, but a few weeks ago he was quoting Trump when he said it was on the table.
that’s not the same though is it? Implying you can’t trust a denial when it contradicts previous comments. but I’ve already stated there are lying opportunistic hypocrits on both sides, so I’m not disputing the point
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www....bbi-mirvis-general-election-a9218681.html?amp https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp....ng-labour-antisemitism-progressive-government there’s a couple of balanced views... slagging off the loony left, but putting it in context
Just a quick note There’s a party political broadcast on behalf of the Labour Party on itv chaired by Julie etchingham