Off Topic Prince Andrew

I’m 43 age has got nothing to do with knowin or not knowin your street talk init

 

Yeh but you got a young lad so thats cheating

 

One question I have, and I'm not sure if its already been answered, but by almost all European laws the act was not illegal as the girl was 17 years old. If Prince Andrew, as ****ed up as it may be, was to have sex with a 17 year old British girl it would be completely legal. So, can he even be prosecuted? Certainly not here in Britain?

If Epstein was supplying the girl, forcing her essentially, then still Epstein is the one primarily to blame as Andrew can simply claim ignorance.

 

I claimed ignorance to my then gf when i came back from ibiza with an std.


Didnt work

 

yeah but the warts gave that away surely?

 

When they started appearing on her mouth yeh

 

She was probably just a bit upset that you came back bru ... that and her finally going to Specsavers...

 

If the offence took place where the age of consent is different ignorance is no defense, if travelling you should make yourself aware of legal differences, if you were caught 'drink driving' in a country where the legal limit is lower they aren't going to let you off because of the difference in the UK, same applies.

 

I did suggest that but apparently it seems like something might have happened between them in Florida. The law is different over there.

Unfortunately, I also believe that the US authorities would have 'lost' any incriminating evidence on one of our Royals.

 

The mad thing is that he could potentially have had sex with her legally in one state then have crossed a border where if they have sex again he would have committed an illegal act ...

 

That’s really not that mad.

 

Would be if you were an 18 year old lad on a driving holiday with your 17 year old girlfriend ...

 

Everywhere has different rules.
There age of consent laws in some countries as low as ****ing 12!!
It seems mad, especially in the US where each state has different laws, but the only fair way to do it is to govern by geography.
If Andy took a girl who he could legally bang in the UK, to somewhere where it was illegal, then the guys a ****ing idiot.

 

Surely the point is more that she was coerced regardless of where it happened.

 

Yep pure arrogance that he wouldn't get busted. I still think we should do swapsies, we will give them Andrew and they give us that bitch who killed that lad by driving on the wrong side of the road and legged it under diplomatic immunity.

 

Yep, it's pretty ****ing disgusting it's pretty clear they had no idea what they were getting into until it was too late to get out

 

More likely Liz will get on the blower to Trump and agree to make sure that charges are dropped against the hit and run bitch in exchange for them "losing" any intelligence that the yanks have on Andrew......

 

Indeed. The argument that a girl is fair game if she’s above the age of consent is a bit simplistic.

 

I'd agree that both are unlikely to see a court room

 

Not sure I've seen anybody put that idea forward on here ... but there are a lot of assumptions and assertions being made about the circumstances surrounding events that are not from first hand accounts or knowledge ...