He did all his writings in Basel and started his first church in Geneva (I think) where he clashed with Luther. In all honesty, his name shouldn't have been in the post at all. I'm in a bad mood and thought I'd align literal assertions from misconceptions with the literal assertions from biblical mistranslations in his and his subsequent followers churches. Much like aligning witch drownings/persecuting the Hugenots with Dallas getting the sack. Like I said, I'm in a bad mood
It was more the fact that he came from France and he was buried in Switzerland that makes it not make much sense(or less sense certainly!)
But his doctrine came from Switzerland - surely Geneva is the "Rome" of Northern Protestantism? You don't associate the Medici popes with Florence, for example. Why is his name always Anglicised anyway?
Not sure why it is Anglicised to be honest, but what I was getting at was he(as a person, as opposed to Calvinism) never really left Switzerland in the end as he was buried there!
You do one ****e analogy and it leads to this semantic pish about whether you included an -ism or not.
K.Wilson was fine apart from that **** clearance for the first goal. Loovens was ****ing awful, Brown did little, Ki was ****ing gash, Samaras was his usual hand on hips let every other ****er run after the ball & if Bangura was a horse he would have been put down for the **** he was doing.
As long as you learn from your mistakes, everything should be OK! Just don't let yourself and the rest of the forum down!
It still stands, you would say "take the <insertname> out of the boy" rather than "take the <insertdoctrine> out of the boy" <figurativebeel>
Is this a schooling? <claimanythingasavictory> I'm still right and, although it was a ****e analogy, it was still fairly clever.
