What has changed since then to make labour so far behind. Surely they should be ahead as they have now abandoned the idea of leaving the EU and I assume you think that the reason it was so close last time wasn’t to do with their Brexit stance.Yes.
What has changed since then to make labour so far behind. Surely they should be ahead as they have now abandoned the idea of leaving the EU and I assume you think that the reason it was so close last time wasn’t to do with their Brexit stance.
The 2017 manifesto was very popular with the public because it promised to leave the European Union by “accepting the result of the referendum”, and that “freedom of movement would end when we leave the European Union”.
We don't need a soft alternative. I don't care who the leader is as long as they continue with the radical policies that Corbyn and McDonnel have put forward. The 2017 manifesto was very popular with the public and I think that the 2019 would prove equally so if it wasn't for he farce of Brexit.
Nothing to do with Brexit then?In 2017 the public were given an almost daily addition to Labour's plans which gave rise to the 'Magic Money Tree' jibe, the public aren't totally stupid enough not to realise that this time there are elements of the manifesto which are not credible cost-wise as the IFS stated. McDonnell rubbished the IFS but quoted them in support of the manifesto previously so he is contradicting himself again. All said and done Corbyn is the weakest link...
Granted, they were. Do you think that it has nothing to do with their stance on Brexit though?They're about as far behind now as they were last time. Three weeks is a long time.
Granted, they were. Do you think that it has nothing to do with their stance on Brexit though?
If most Labour supporters are anti-Brexit and most Labour MPs (former MPs) are anti- Brexit, why do you think their neutral stance is correct?They need to make the election about things other than Brexit, so the neutral stance is correct in my opinion. Most Labour supporters are anti-Brexit anyway.
Nothing to do with Brexit then?
If most Labour supporters are anti-Brexit and most Labour MPs (former MPs) are anti- Brexit, why do you think their neutral stance is correct?
But I still don't understand why they wouldn't campaign to Remain now, or why they took their Leave stance in 2017Because there was a (deeply flawed and probably Russian influenced) referendum that came out on the Leave side. It would be wrong to just ignore it, but we need a re-run, which Labour is offering.
Why would they need to do that if Brexit isn't as important as you suggest?Probably not as much as many think. But don't be surprised if in the last couple of days before polling if the Tories are well clear in the polls there may be an 'understanding' between Labour and the other opposition parties, I can't see them all walking blindly into a certain Tory win scenario...
Why would they need to do that if Brexit isn't as important as you suggest?
Comrade Jezzbollah and comrade McDonnel maybe, who knowsThis is a dictatorship!! Who are the mods again...Boris and Nigel![]()

I don't think in practice they can wait til a couple of days before the election. Something like that would need agreeing and organising constituency by constituency to have any chance of working.Probably not as much as many think. But don't be surprised if in the last couple of days before polling if the Tories are well clear in the polls there may be an 'understanding' between Labour and the other opposition parties, I can't see them all walking blindly into a certain Tory win scenario...
I don't think in practice they can wait til a couple of days before the election. Something like that would need agreeing and organising constituency by constituency to have any chance of working.
But I still don't understand why they wouldn't campaign to Remain now, or why they took their Leave stance in 2017
They didn't take a Leave stance in 2017, they took an 'honour the result' stance.