For the third time on here: no, he isn't. I don't post on forums (except for this past week or so, where I've repeatedly had to tell people I'm not someone else, because if he says something libellous I really can't be having it come back on me) and have absolutely no interest in being lumped in with the thoughts of someone else.
I haven't said anything libellous if it helps, just a bunch of amateur legalese from the cast of Steptoe and Son here.
Yeah there's no way KM can be Chris because KM is much more positive about SD/CM, relatively speaking obviously
The good thing is while km, Chris, jvokes and any other persona he is that day is having a go at owdfellar and me he’s leaving the club and it’s owners from abuse. The daftest thing is I actually have angst towards sd and cm, I think these owners are dragging us to their lower league level, and I think they need to go. This club isn’t a small division one club in everything except, sadly, at present, on the pitch, and if this continues for much longer it’ll become irreversible. Leicester boys showed us how bad we really are last night, and alarm bells should be ringing all over the place. If we’re not going to have this level as the norm then we need ambitious owners, and that’s not what these lads are, they’re minor players creating a minor club. But that’s only my considered opinion, unlike my colleagues named above who have a go at them cos there’s a y in the day I think they’re trying their best but that’s not enough for our club.
That is all far worse than anything I've said Incredible. I don't think they need to go, I just have doubts about them from a football p.o.v and whatever GOM says now, they've admitted that they used the club's cash in the summer to pay for Donald's shares, which I think is bad for the club and IN MY OPINION wrong, even if it's legal. I don't know why he didn't acknowledge that yesterday when asked directly. So my entire point has been that if they can sort those issues out so the club succeeds, good, if they can't, we'll end up in some serious **** because of it down the line, whether we have FPP involved or not may be irrelevant if they get us too low and FPP decide not to follow up their 'investment' option that nobody actually knows exists yet (hence the question on page one!). I don't attack them every day, I literally asked some questions a few days ago that @HeatonMackem and others agreed were very valid questions in a thread where others were asking them, and was happy to leave it, yet I spend an inordinate amount of time being called pathetic names or explicit lies about who I am etc based on nothing more than conspiracy theories with zero - and I mean zero because they're not true, on my own life I will state I am not jvokes or chris wetherspoon or any other person you've said I am - evidence. I look forward to you calling me more petty names and insinuating that I am blah blah blah.
why did you spell @Kittenmittons incorrectly? was it deliberate? was it a deliberate attempt at confusing us as to your true identity?
christ you absolute raging nutjob. Apology accepted, now can we stop with the absolutely insane conspiracy theories?
It's from a long running TV show in america. Regardless, what on earth does it matter to you? I was kittenmittens on rtg, I don't have any other accounts there, here, or anywhere else. I don't tweet about it but if I did, rest assured I wouldn't expose myself to dribbling paranoid conspiracy theorists who hound anyone who asks even the most valid of questions. And btw, I don't know why Chris is saying the things he's saying today. There's nothing bad in it, but I think he would best served waiting to see what comes of the questions and answers, and/or any statements made by the club or FPP.
From what was posted in the other thread, that today's filings proved various things about equity injection prior to FPP etc. I actually think he may be proven right, but that doesn't mean that they haven't paid off some of the debt they owed which is a net positive. Basically, I think he should be hanging fire before assuming the worst. It serves nobody if he jumps to the wrong conclusions or implies that it's a bad thing.
For god sake someone tell kildaremackem on RTG that the shareholding amount hasn't changed, Donald has had 74%, Charlie 6% and Sartori 20% for over a year. Arvesa is Sartori's company. Absolutely thick as mince that lad.
If it's on the takeover thread that was from yesterday. He's said something presumably accusatory today that he must have got loads of stick for because he's deleted it!
I think he said that it was set up for dividends to be paid this year, which is true, they cleared the accumulated debt and filed a statement of solvency, so essentially we will make a legitimate profit from this point and could theoretically pay dividends. I don't see much wrong with that, was there something else?
There was nothing else. I tried to offer clarity on what the filings meant as I knew people would ask. Unfortunately some people took it the wrong way and thought I was suggesting it was a method for the current owners to run off with some money. That couldn't be further from what I was saying, although I'll admit I didn't explain particularly well. I deleted it because if people are getting the wrong end of the stick (wilfully or otherwise) it isn't worth the hassle. Would just like to add I wasn't being negative yesterday. I was just clarifying what had happened and stating that there had been no equity put in since Short. I advised that's normal as any money in from SD and co to date would simply bring their loan balance down. I'm also of the view that FPP's investment/loan/whatever is a big positive step for the club.
What definitive number of people need to tell you how you are acting is required for you to consider they may be right? All this because SD embarrassed you on Twitter. And yes of course I know you will. disagree with all of my words due to the unwillingness to think.
Same could be asked of your interest in how SD runs SAFC, despite the confirmed investment by proper financial experts.
