I'll post this link every time you post the word influential with a smiley and have a little laugh to myself in the knowledge that the only laughing is that at you. The NME is the most INFLUENTIAL music newspaper of the last fifty years. Their opinion and knowledge on and of music means something. Unlike yours. LOL https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/apr/17/buyingmusic.shopping
After a quick skim I have concluded that because of metth Comm is convinced autism = stupid. By his own logic he himself has severe autism. Fukfuk
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2011/oct/02/smiths-morrissey-fans-changed-lives https://www.baeblemusic.com/musicblog/6-9-2017/the-relevancy-of-the-smiths-30-years-later.html https://www.quora.com/How-influential-was-the-English-rock-band-the-Smiths LOL.
The only reason there appears more labels is because it's not socially acceptable to just call people spastics and *****s anymore (rightly so). I know people prefer lesser labels, but it's really not helpful. Another good example would be these days we refer to people by their true identity, that could be British, South African, Jamican, now I know that is more labels but it's far better than the one label that used to involve the N word. Hope that clarifies any doubt over too many labels. Anyway this nutter is off to do some work now
Proper dumb **** me bro, that’s why I have to pay my butler to write all of these messages, I can’t even spell.
Mental Health disorder/condition? Is this not ok now? Genuinely need to know what is acceptable way of describing a condition someone has? Or do we just pretend it's not there and that we are all just exactly the same, despite the obvious evidence that we're not?
Not sure your point or why it has to be under one label as you described Mental Health disorder/condition and not... Autism if that's the medical diagnosis... or maybe dementia... or maybe a stroke... or maybe a tumor... or maybe schizophrenia... or maybe cancer... or maybe paranoia... or maybe depression... Sorry to give you too many labels. That's not meant to come across as rude by the way.
Nah i moaning more about how everyone had labels nowadays for literally everything rather than just getting on with life. Of course people do suffer from mh but anything nowadays is a reason for excusing someones behaviour
but some people Bobby can't 'just get on with life' - Sadly they don't have a wheel chair or a walking stick as an aid for you to identify their ill health.
I'll explain this better...I had a friend 6 months ago, that was deemed to have what many might call a mental health problem. The diagnosis was 'stress' - now I could apply your words to that situation, which is 'just get on with life' - A phrase I can understand, but I prefer to make more insight into someone's ill health. I sensed that my friend didn't have MH, because she was not showing the symptoms I would recognise with stress or depression. She died within weeks from a brain tumour. Obviously this is not me having a go in anyway at you Bobby, but it just makes me think with more caution, regarding someone just getting on with it.
Ok, so while I agree that *****, spakker, spaz, flid or whatever has no place in our vocabulary anymore, surely 'has autism' (or any of the above) does? That's not a label, it's statement of fact and people shouldn't be offend or outraged by it.
I agree, I don't think anyone has suggested you can't use the word 'autism' that is a diagnosis. As you say it's a statement of fact if the diagnosis is correct.
No and i get that. Obviously MH is a real issue and in the case of your mate it was even worse and maybe im too blaise and flippant about this but i feel like nowadays theres always too many excuses. Having said all that i dont actually know too many people who have MH or used it as an excuse.
