I've clicked onto a random post involving Clive, and its easy to see he was on the wind up, even then https://www.not606.com/threads/kilkenny-criticises-bates.87584/page-2#post-1334126
Lol and WJ says he was never abusive,well he was calling OLOF stupid and pathetic on that post, maybe you should have done your homework WJ before coming out with the, he was an Angel crap.
Glory was much more annoying than Clive. We were referring to Clive's second stint on here. Admittedly he was at times annoying in his first stint, but second time around he seemed to have tried to rectify that and engaged in reasoned debate. This second chance was cut short for reasons that remain unknown, apart from an alleged allegiance to Bluememe. Seemed a bit harsh at the time, and still does.
Yes and knowing how sensitive OLOF actually is, you can imagine him taking that personally. See WJ, loads of complaints about Clive '
Can you dig up a sample of his more recent posts when he came back, to display what he said that was deemed a banning offence?
Second stint ? So he was banned previous as well, tells you a lot, as you said Glory annoyed a few yet people didnt want him banned,yet no one said don't ban Clive time, why ? What does that tell you ?. Imo he wasn't even a Leeds fan just a wum.
You can't discuss who, as that's personal, but you can most certainly discuss the number of complainers, and the nature of the complaints. There has to be an element of transparency in your role, otherwise you could be accused of getting rid of people that annoyed you, just for the sake of it. Like in this situation, that accusation could easily be levied, especially when you're reluctant to discuss. The facts are simple - he lasted 12 days, made 98 posts & was rewarded with 61 likes. Doesn't sound like a serial transgressor's stats, does it? I came across Clive's name shortly after reading a string of Captain Jackboot posts where he abused several of our posters in a row, with absolutely no call for it. I tried to recollect why Clive had been banned, as I truly don't recall his behaviour being any more than irritating. 'Irritating' at the very least describes many of the posts from our very own Swastika-waver.
Well you posted his comments on a thread from September 2011, and he was banned two months later. He was allowed back a couple of years ago, posted 98 times, and seemed to be conducting himself ok. That's the period we're on about.
That's 2011 when he was an annoying ****. He was given a second chance a couple of years ago when he seemed ok. Why was he banned the second time?
Ell if that's an old post you have copied how come WJ message count is the same as his current count? Forget that it updates on all posts
By clicking on Clive's profile he was last seen November 2011. I assume that's when he was banned first time around. But he came back a couple of years ago (maybe his username had a slight change so he could get back on) and made 98 posts.
If you go back to your first ever post, it will give you your current standing. Also, if you change your name on Not606, every post you have sent out will be in that new name.
