Rangers v Celtic

Get them in front of an independent enquiry and under oath I say.

What say you Mindy?

 

Sacked immediately and sacked on the spot mean exactly the same thing you fùcking idiot.

It was the victim who said Souness sacked him on the spot in Daley's BBC article. Do you not believe him?

No need for a two year double secret investigation that doesn't talk to any victims. Neely admitted his guilt, papped oot, police informed, simples.

That's not good enough for you though. You think Rangers should have kept him on and let him have access to kids whilst a thorough investigation took place and it was decided these were scurrilous accusations.

#thecelticway

 

Oooft!

Andy Ritchie absolutely laying waste to the seperate entity myth and suggesting that the great Tommy Burns was in cahoots with Frank Cairney.

#smokinggun

 

Calm down Aldo

Im telling you the reports were different.

Immediately when accused is different from on the spot when admitted.

By the way the victim also said the police were not called by Rangers. Do you not believe him?

 

Tommy Burns thought someone was innocent?

Luckily for Harry Dunn, so did Jock Wallace.

 

Oooft! The strawclutcher struggling here.

The victim was in the room when Neely was sacked. So he witnessed that happening. No reason to disbelieve him.

However.

He has no idea if Rangers did or did not call the police. He can only say what happened in his presence. So yes I believe him when he says Rangers didn't call the police when he was present. That doesn't mean they didn't call the police at all.

Sorry but thems the facts.

 

Remember when Southampton had a 2 year investigation into child abuse at their club and Not606 said what about Celtic

 

Really! Is that why he brought Andy Ritchie in to cut ties with Celtic boys club and distance Celtic from the "seperate entity "

The cover up of all cover ups.

"Brainstorming with Cairney in Cairney's front room"

Sickening stuff this.

 

Straw clutching?

You invoked an abused Child as a witness then dismiss him when it does not suit your agenda

 

Remember when Southampton published the results of their investigation, apologised to the victims and offered compensation?

Not606 said Celtic should do the same.

Are we not into the third year of this double secret investigation yet?

 

No I didn't.

 

You generally cut ties with a second party. Nice to see you agree st Patrick's Sports Academy are a seperate entity.

By the way, were you up all night thinking of *****s?

 

Celtic did.

Paid out a victim around 8 weeks ago.

 

Is that what you got from that article.

Not the fact that Celtic Legend and then manager Tommy Burns was conspiring with Frank Cairney AFTER Cairney had appeared in court on child abuse charges?

So Tommy Burns knew and tried to get rid of the offending evidence. Brought in Andy Ritchie to do the dirty. Andy Ritchie admits he himself was a victim of the sexual predators at Celtic park.

Fact is it would be harder to find somebody at Celtic park who didn't know.



No mate. I don't need to be up all night. The evidence of child abuse at Celtic is massive and easily accessible.

 

1 down over 100 to go.

 

Andy Ritchie did not say he was abused at Celtic Park.

You are making things up again.

Thats worse than clutching at straws

 

"We would desperately try to avoid being last out of the car. Whoever left last risked the feeling of that clawing, clammy hand on the inside of their thigh as they went to leave. That happened to me once or twice"

Andy Ritchie's words mate, not mine.

Maybe he just made it up though eh.


You really need to learn to read the articles people post if you are going to comment on them. In fact it would be a good idea to read the articles you post before you comment on them as well.

 

Where is the mention of Celtic Park?

You really need to learn to read...