Yet another diversion. We weren't discussing the Jury's verdict, were we? Or are you going to tell me we were? Nothing would surprise me now. You are talking verdicts again. We were discussing legal states, which are a binary guilty or innocent.
No we were discussing you saying the judge says you are Innocent and not not guilty, but as you refuse or are too thick to answer that, I was trying to help your brain cell understand it.
Nope. He's obviously got a Bielsa-type coach. He's reaching a new high in being a tit. Such dedication, eh? Obviously feeling challenged by Captain Jackboot, so go some help in to regain his title.
When it came to Boris I never did but thankfully he’s failed to reach even my very, very low expectations.
Ha! I've replied clearly & correctly many times on here, and Eric has added clarity for you, but still you ignore it all. That comparison I made was spot on - perhaps you should change your name to CheshTaughtDianneAbbotMaths?
You're right, we have just won a game, but I didn't need that to comment on here. It's raining outside and I had to say something otherwise I'd have fallen asleep reading your repetitive crap. Why don't you and WJ stop cluttering up this fascinating thread about Brexit and let dbc get a word in edgeways?
So go some help in to regain his title Can you get Bielsa's coach to translate that to English While he's at it, get him to tell you about not guilty.
I gave you the post numbers. You clearly didn't read them. I'm not here to repeatedly fuel your foolishness - find them yourself & continue to make a fool of yourself. You don't need my help - you manage it very well on your own.
Not me, it was you that brought it up. Somehow got it into your head that a court speaks. Did a voice in your head tell you this? Perhaps it was the court speaking to you?
Well you keep replying and you're thicker than a brick wall, a brick wall would have answered by now.
