Greta Thunberg

I already had 200mb of material downloaded.

Safire project isn't looking particularly exciting. We already have plenty of examples of high powered plasma generation.
Nothing so far to turn gravity on its head

 

It is clear that you are too heavily invested in the current shambolic paradigm.

Nothing I put to you is going to be good enough.

Let's leave it at that.

 

Let's not,
I will read the research, including the front of the thunderbolts introduction that confirms that gravity and thermodynamic formula and modeling works well at planetary level and therefore disputes the claims of Venus having a near miss with earth within the last few thousand years.

 

Fill your boots.

 

I am sorry Looney Leftie your comment is so stupid it is beyond belief. You and your friend Piskie are the living examples of dumbing down. The 60 year old book IS the evidence. It is the huge body of work carried out by Velikovsky Scientists have never all agreed about this work, for sure the establishment dismisses it but there have always been a number of scientists interested enough to look into it. Contrary to your beliefs science is often reluctant to give up it's 'held' views when new evidence comes along so it's not uncommon. What's interesting is that Velikovsky's work is still the subject of debate in scientific circles so the answer to the questions of whether it is right or wrong is not complete. You and Piskie may or may not be interested in this but to think your opinion on this matters is frankly pathetic. Equally your opinion on brain surgery is of no interest unless I have misjudged the fact that you are surgeons.

 

I will.
If I say anything that you have evidence to the contrary then do feel free to chip in.

 

A book isn't the evidence,
It is an opinion piece with cherry picked examples to fit the narrative.
That is true regardless of the book.

Which is why I'm looking for what it is that convinced HIAG he is right.

 

The fact that, on its publication, some of the World's most eminent scientists of the day demanded its removal from the scientific press (a modern day book burning, as some have referred to it) tells me all I need to know about how relevant Velikovsky's work is, and remains.

Many attempts have been made by the mainstream to discredit Velikovsky and all have failed.

 

I think that man has questioned why am I here from the beginning which is a natural progression. Religion for some people satisfies that. I think most people sort that side out for themselves if they are free thinking.

 

For something to be held as true you must be able to prove it and show it is the most likely scenario.

This is like claiming climate change doesn't exist because we knew less about it 60 years ago.

Gravity, relativity and the heliocentric model didn't go down well when first proposed either, but subsequent research showed them to be largely true. So far I've seen nothing offered of a similar nature.

 

Are you being obtuse by design? Or are you genuinely stupid?

Books are a way of summarising the evidence. Properly researched books provide a bibliography to other works and scientific papers that corroborate their summaries.

Have you actually read any scientific books?

What the Hell are you babbling on about?

What exactly is it that I am "convinced" I am "right" about?

We're talking about the EXPLORATION of an alternative theory to the current shambolic paradigm. You dismiss outright and refuse to read or research any of its works. I don't. That's all there is to it. There is no right, no wrong, merely the courage to challenge the Establishment and ask the questions that people like you and Pixie say have already been answered.

 

And you never will.

Bye.

 

Books are supported by subsequent research and analysis.

Take the origin of species. It wasn't taken as gospel, it was debated and researched until concensus agreed. The facts supported the claim and did not offer a viable alternative.

Take the book you refer to, where is the evidence to support it?
Missing, because even he admitted it could not be replicated or modelled.

 

Why are conspiracies and debunked theories always hosted on websites that look as if they were built in the 90s?

 

Go away.

 

Or what, you'll cry?

 

You talking about the NASA website, yeah?

 

You are an idiot and I have grown bored with you.

 

Can't answer his questions so you get personal. Tragic.

 

On the contrary, I have answered the idiot's questions, but he ignores what he is told. I have grown bored with saying the same thing over and over.

He's like a toddler who keeps saying the word "why" to every answer you give it.