But he didn't. 'Cos he's a tit. Brother resigned from Cabinet. Sister slaughters him on live tv. Father won't comment. And that's the people that allegedly love him! And before you say it, joking or otherwise, Corbyn is NOT the answer. Oddly enough, being a dyed-in-the-wool socialist, neutral on Brexit (through ignorance that no-one else seems to admit to), and not liking the man's personality - I would still take Farage as PM. Even if he is a politician, and by definition, lies, at least he doesn't seem to get caught doing it. It's not outwith the bounds of possibility that it might happen in this totally fukked-up political world we're enduring.
Makes sense. Cattle in Scotland are Scottish cattle, not European. Cattle in Eire are Irish, not European. Cattle in Parliament only think they 're European.
As Scotland, Wales and N/Ireland have their own parliaments, it's clear to me he was on about England.But accept, some would want a debate,vote or referendum on it.
Now it's Sky Australia talking to America about Brexit. Everyone around world are talking sense except the remoaners. The world see the remoaners for what they really are, the remoaners can't see it though.
Majority of people back Boris, includes new polls and remainers changing to leave. Thank you Corbynated chicken and his chickettes, I said it would happen, but Corbyn won't listen to anyone, cos he's a communistic dumb dumb.
The last democratic vote in this country was an election, where she was elected an mp - mps are representatives who can vote however they like. It’s referenda that have always been regarded as unconstitutional... at least until they brought an act in to say how they could be used. Main reason for not having them is to never let the public decide on something important that they don’t understand the repercussions of. Basically you only hold a referendum if A - you are totally sure of the result.. or B B - you genuinely don’t care too much what the result is Most are A... and they are almost always used purely for political gain as Cameron did by trying to stifle UKIP. Cameron called it wrong. So now you have a democratic vote... the referendum... at odds with the views of a democratically elected parliament. MPs themselves aren’t being undemocratic. And the idea that all mp’s wanting to remain are acting purely in self interest is disingenuous, no matter how many times it’s repeated. What we have is a Constitutional crisis, caused by this conflict of interest and maybe, given the strength of feeling on the subject it’s time to review the whole parliamentary process. Maybe there should be some alternative systems of government proposed, or at the very least maybe stricter guidelines on enacting of referenda... over/ruling parliament etc. And we could have a referendum on that. And then block it in parliament.
So if I understand your thoughts correctly- MP's are allowed to do just what they want whenever they want by disregarding what their constituents elected them to do. That being the case no point in having elections or referendum. Let's just have anarchy, O'h just a minute
The reason some remoaner MP's received death threats, if in fact they did, it's because of the way they've been behaving themselves against Brexit and the peoples referendum vote. All the MP's signed and agreed to accept and honour the referendum result, but the remoaners didn't, they went back on their word and are treacherous towards the people. They treat the leave voters with contempt and have stabbed them in back. While you're right, elected MP's can vote whichever way they want, within Parliament, they can't just do what they like. They all have to honour, and accept the people's vote. The will of the people is supreme power. Cameron ordered the referendum cos he thought he would win, he lost, remainers lost, remoaners lost, Corbyn and Labour lost, and the all the other two faced backstabbing undemocratic MP's lost. Parliament at moment are full of democratically elected MP's acting in an undemocratic way that don't want Brexit to happen, and they're prepared to do whatever they can to undemocratically stop it........but they can't, because of democracy.........in other words, they've declared an undemocratic war on the Government and the Brexit leave voters.................so all those MP's undemocratically behaving in an undemocratic way are being undemocratic. So what these remoaning undemocratic uneducated MP's want is, to undemocratically bring about a second democratic referendum to overturn a previous democratic referendum, but they want to do it undemocratically cos they're all sore, tantrum throwing, dummy spitting losers. We don't have a constitutional crisis caused by a conflict of interest, we have a bunch of undemocratic idiots who have gone against their agreement and acceptance, against a democratic vote and against the people and the country to try and stop Brexit. Brexit will happen, that's why the undemocratic remoaners are still angry and still trying to stop Brexit.
Parliament was not mentioned. 'London', 'other cities', & 'our country' were the key phrases used. Are you suggesting that the UK PM is only interested in talking about england in his UK PM capacity?
Unless it's all UK business,other countries MPs shouldn't even be allowed in. And why should he not talk about England.
What a stupid question. The Scottish FM has no interest, no say & no vote in english affairs, and has no interest in doing so either. She is the Scottish FM, so rightfully should concentrate solely on Scottish affairs. What this has to do with the Bawjaws ramblings being discussed, I'll never know.
