Off Topic The Burly Arms

Yes, I will.

Because, firstly, nothing in that model, handed down by a Victorian scientist who knew little about electricity and nothing about plasma physics, has been proven to work.

In fact, the standard model is so riddled with holes as to make it useless for all practical purposes.

It’s the fact that you cling to this failed model, with nothing more than faith in the absence of actual science, that makes it extremely difficult for me to take anything you write at all seriously.

 

Likewise mate

 

Wasn't hiags last scientific source a ****ing gardener?

He was I know cos I googled him last time

 

Just had an argument with a cyclist. @PISKIE

Cyclists are twats.

 

Dont think the tags work for him mate

@luvgonzo

Not sure if they working for us cos brb tagged me in the dinner thread earlier and it came up as tagged in notifications? Ain't seen once since tho

 

He'll read it in a bit. Got all sweary with the ****er, funny as ****. He shut up when I was getting to the point of smacking him one.

 

He’s only a gardener because the mainstream won’t listen to him.

 

Seems legit.

 

So seriously

Someone tell me what's happened to Tobes??

 

Mind ya ****in bidness

 

They.

Not ‘we’.

 

I meant we in the terms of us as the human race, but yes, they the scientists



ya ****in pedant

 

I love that video. Fat **** taking a face full of asphalt

 

What did you argue about mate ?

Climate change or HIAG's crackpot gardener's model of the universe ?

 

Stephen Crothers doesn’t propose a model of the Universe. He merely proves that Einstein was full of ****.

 

^^^ Is this what the angry cyclist shouted at you earlier @luvgonzo ?

 

you ****ing kill me sometimes bruv

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Stephen_J._Crothers