Horrible news from Iran. An Iranian woman tried to enter a football stadium there.Was denied entrance because women are not allowed in football stadiums.So…..she set herself on fire in protest. One must never forget,this was a religion invented by an arab to benefit men only. Have you ever seen pictures of those women praying? I haven't!
This is the kind of thing that an "Islamophobe" ( *** ) would say. *** Using the APPG definition (just like the ARSes do) .
He said NOTHING of the kind. 1. She is nothing more than an example of how morons will vote for a pile of dogsh*t as an elected official (see under "brood-mare constituency" ) , providing said pile has the correct colour rosette stuck on top of it. 2. AFAIK, neither Nessie nor Bigfoot have ever run up huge expenses at taxpayers' expense while doing their "public duties" .
Some Leave voters have such an irony deficiency that their response to the government having to publish their texts and emails was to demand the ECHR step in
Personally I think all prospective parliamentary candidates should have to publish their last 10 years social media activities. It would probably mean that only people over 90 would end up standing for parliament but being led by 'the elders' of the tribe might not be such a bad thing.
I pity the poor souls who have to read a decade's worth of tweets from James Cleverley, Ben Bradley or Daniel Kawczynski...
Social media activity is already public domain, so what difference will this make? Seeing someones past Twitter or Facebook posts for example, is a piece of piss. What all this transparency issue is about is emails, WhatsApp and any other encrypted or otherwise direct comms. Speaking of which, do we get to see Philip Hammonds direct correspondences with the EU who he openly colluded with? No, thought not. In other news, can someone remind me who the leader of the Labour party is? Last time I checked it was Jeremy Corbyn but seems Tom Watson has other ideas... again.
I've never heard of that one,but if you suggest I'm a muslim critic.....you've got that ****ing right....and if you're one of them...**** you too!
No, it is not. You are relying on somebody having made an ARCHIVE copy of something posted, and that copy then being made available in the public domain forever more. If some gobsh*te deletes their Twatter posts and nothing archived it, or Twatter itself deletes the post (they do not provide a PUBLIC search interface to their own archives) , then into the 1984 "memory hole" it goes.
No doubt you are a nice guy etc, but the rules are the rules. You are an Islamophobe pure and simple, according to a definition that definitely appeals immensely to the "orange man bad" crowd. And who are we to contest that definition ?? Nothing personal (but I'm sure you know that) .
There are tons of archivers, scrapers and aggregators on the internet. One of the oldest being https://archive.org/web/ which as been in existence for yonks. You seriously think when someone "deletes" a tweet, it doesn't remain in the various cloud databases it was saved to? The internet never forgets!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet#Archives_by_Google_Groups_and_DejaNews Todays' Dejanews is tomorrows' nothing (or worse, owned by tomorrows' Google) .
I refer you to the previously posted wikipedia link : "Google has been criticized by Vice and Wired contributors as well as former employees for its stewardship of the archive and for breaking its search functionality."
