You have called pretty much everyone here the ‘thickest **** in the room’ at some point. Your hyperbole is duly noted and will be taken into consideration when reading your future posts.
all the royals are descended from the Scottish Royal Family, I thought a ****ing Scots man would know that, at least. Do you not know WHY there is an act of union? Here's a clue, James IV of Jockland and his wife. You really are the thickest **** in the room.
All royals are descended from the Scots Royal family? So King Abdullah the third of Jordan is descended from the Scots royal family? Are you sure about that? You seem to keep getting your kings mixed up. It was James the Vl that became James the 1st of England. That was the union of the crowns. The act of Union didn't happen until 1707 and the monarch then was Queen Anne. So you not only made a cùnt of your Kings but you made a cùnt of your unions as well. Oh see you, you're so silly. Fùcking moronic even.
Look pal, if I was guilty of doing what you say I was doing then I would have been doing it you by now. Now, behave soft lad.
lol, except I've so completely owned you on the Scottish ancestry of the British royal family that you've had to bring in the Jordanian royal family into it, but what the **** have the Jordanians got to do with the act of the union, or George III, the objects of the discussion? Are are you admitting that you're so lacking in comprehension skills that you couldn't discern that 'the royals' meant the British royal family, as it was their ancestry that was the subject of discussion, rather than every royal family in existence? Or are you saying you're a so sad and pathetic you have to grab onto any pedantic minutiae to save face after making yourself look a moron for the umpteenth time? Like all your 'got to get the last word in' posts, you haven't thought it through, though you and thought are probably mutually exclusive.
