Just leave the ref to get on with it. Mike Dean ****ed the spuds over nicely today without the need for VAR. Funny that VAR then ****ed them in the arse again, but it shows how **** it is really.
At the end of the day, regardless of all the debate it essentially comes down to this. It's ****ing dogshit and needs lobbing in the skip
I'm with you on this. There aren't any City fans on here, but the others will come round eventually when they have a last min winner scrubbed off for some VAR bollocks.
I clocked it several pages before you posted this comment you dozy **** https://www.not606.com/threads/bang-out-of-order.376852/page-5#post-13094263 You just got caught up in the excitement of trying to **** Valley over after #tipexgate so I'll let that one slide.
Just looking at timings of posts, tells me members are not butt hurt by HiaGs constant superb wumming, no sireee, not at all. And no evidence of Fosse still crying over being handed his arse like a Valentine's Day Massacre while he was on holiday, drinking babychams and vino frizzante rosa....basically pink fizzy pop. Im guessing HiaG will have to up his game, to get them to discuss him 24/7
It wouldn't be like a break in NFL or NBA though where the game actually stops whilst players gather on the sidelines. I'm talking about stopping the clock for throw ins and corners etc, so just a few seconds really, but it would stop the infuriating time wasting
As a Man United fan you wouldn't be ... it will likely halve the penalty count at OT ... ... on the bright side... you'd probably miss them anyway I'm all for it ... should end or minimise coming away from a game feeling you've been unfairly robbed
I actually agree with this but they will not. Not while the financial men that rule the game accept it's decisions. Those decisions will fruit at the end of the season, when Man City look back on a perfectly good goal, that was disallowed imo! And Kane looks back on what should have been a penalty imho. Some might argue it's swings and roundabout's but we already had that before VAR. I feel VAR is getting involved in decisions it wasn't introduced, and it is making the refs role redundant, for fear of making mistake. I guy on TV tried to degend VAR by giving a percentage of accuracy, while avoiding quoting accuracy before it. But i will give you it, one season that was tested before VAR, despite all the debates and arguments, when reviewed, evidenced throughout the whole season there was only ONE mistake that caused injustice by its decision. But hey it's what the money men want and as per, we will just lump and accept what we are told.
It takes too much time, Take Jesus disallowed goal for example and how much time they took to disallow it, Also the Martial penalty incident last Saturday, I don’t think VAR looked at to be honest, I’m all for goal line technology, But not VAR, a They’ve took it too far in my opinion.
Exactly. It's still subjective, so there's always going to be debate about the decisions. For me it hasn't improved the decision making process at all, because both the last min City goal and the Kane pen should have stood. All it has done has taken some of the excitement out of the game and ****ed off fans.
Ive no problem with goal line technology, it is a clear cut decision that requires no human intervention or interpretation. VAR is the complete opposite. Maybe we need the same as Cricket as i understand it. Three calls per team during a game, after that, that's it! Other than that, the VAR onus shouldn't be on the ref, it's making a mockery of their role.
Goal line technology is fine, as you say it's clear cut. Everything else is subjective so just leave it to the ref. I'm not up for this 3 reviews bollocks either, it's a **** idea.
