Liverpool to investigate 9/11 tweet from Nathan Eccleston Liverpool are investigating striker Nathan Eccleston for comments on Twitter that suggested the September 11 attacks were not the work of terrorists. A tweet that has since been taken down said: "I ain't going to say attack don't let the media make u believe that was terrorist that did it. #OTIS." OTIS reportedly stands for Only the Illuminati Succeed. The 20-year-old has made nine first-team appearances for Liverpool. A club statement said: "The club takes this matter extremely seriously and senior club officials have informed Nathan Eccleston that we are undertaking an investigation into the circumstances surrounding these postings and will decide on an appropriate course of action." Eccleston, who has over 39,000 followers on the social-networking site, has since tweeted: "If you don't like what I have to say un follow me!! Some things get took way out of context..." The Manchester-born striker has spent time on loan at Huddersfield Town and Charlton Athletic, and has played for the England Under-17 team.
What happened that wonderful concept of free speech that the US and UK have been fighting so hard to preserve since 9/11. Seems like its only their free speech
[video=youtube;C4t6tBTBwQU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4t6tBTBwQU[/video] I guess the children of Iraq must have done something pretty terrible. [video=youtube;6K5M0xtxQVQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K5M0xtxQVQ[/video] Notice Bush's subconscious hand movements when he says "the guilty"
Laugh all you want but the body does things subconsciously that give you away. You can tell if someone is recalling a story or creating a story from subconcious eye movements. The eyes react to certain processes in the brain, and your hands can give away alot of information aswell.
Are you trying to tell us that Bush is guilty because he moves his fingers inwards when he says "guilty"?
He also only blinked 3 times in 15 seconds meaning 12 blinks a minute. Generally, between each blink is an interval of 2–10 seconds; actual rates vary by individual averaging around 10 blinks per minute in a laboratory setting. However, when lying this rate increases. HMMMMMM
Its probably rubbish, I mean why would anyone who was guilty publicly tell people not to question an event? Just stupid isnt it