Nice one mate.............................arrrrggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh **** it............................................no.....................no more.
Good thinking batman. Where is the little tosser anyway...............monaco............oh monaco.............come out...........come out.............wherever you are...................
are you sure? chomsky openly calls Bush a terrorist, accuses the media as being a 'bought priesthood' he also believes that the founding of israel was a mistake, wasnt he denied entry into israel because of his views? and he is of jewish heritage He also, i believe, argues for the burden of proof falling on authority, failure to do so should result in removal of said authority or is it just the bits that suit that you agree with?
You back again? Does Chomsky think 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB? (that is what we were discussing) yes or NO (there's a clue in there) Here's exactly what he said: "I think the Bush administration would have had to be utterly insane to try anything like what is alleged, for their own narrow interests, and do not think that serious evidence has been provided to support claims about actions that would not only be outlandish, for their own interests, but that have no remote historical parallel. " Thank you call again and don't let the proverbial door hit you on the arse on the way out.
One of the major consequences of the 9/11 movement has been to draw enormous amounts of energy and effort away from activism directed to real and ongoing crimes of state, and their institutional background, crimes that are far more serious than blowing up the WTC would be, if there were any credibility to that thesis. That is, I suspect, why the 9/11 movement is treated far more tolerantly by centers of power than is the norm for serious critical and activist work. How do you personally set priorities? That's of course up to you. I've explained my priorities often, in print as well as elsewhere, but we have to make our own judgments. Every power system in the world was going to exploit it for its own interests: the Russians in Chechnya, China against the Uighurs, Israel in the occupied territories,... etc., and states would exploit the opportunity to control their own populations more fully through "prevention of terrorism acts" and the like. By the "who gains" argument, every power system in the world could be assigned responsibility for 9/11. The concept of "false flag operation" is not a very serious one, in my opinion. None of the examples described, or any other in history, has even a remote resemblance to the alleged 9/11 conspiracy. I'd suggest that you look at each of them carefully. Guess who? Yep, Noam Chomsky.
