I’d put money on that being fake. The stitching in the cockerel looks abysmal. Nike may do very similar designs in their kits for different teams but their general style is usually quite “attractive”. That shirt looks like it’s been done by a kid in secondary school textile class.
It’s not the only image doing the rounds. I saw another one of the same design elsewhere. The kit itself could be fake, but the design might not be. It wouldn’t surprise me if this is the one. I really like the design, it’s just a shame the collar looks absolutely massive.
What would you prefer? It’s interesting reading twitter. - so many fans with differing opinions. Personally, I like our home kit to be simple, and be pretty much all white. It’s such a shame that the AIA sponsor continues to be such an eye sore. What a difference it would make if it was navy.
I've just seen a quote by Jimmy Greaves Unbelievable......We've had cocaine, bribery and compulsive gambling ....but just when you thought there would be no more surprises in football, Vinnie Jones turns out to be an international player
Yeah pretty much plain white, maybe a bit of blue on the sides of the body (not the sleeve). I also liked it when the Spurs cockerel was inside the shield a couple years ago. Someone fixed up a concept shirt not so long ago, will try and find it then post, was proper sexy.
That was my initial reaction too. Whoever fixed it up needs to get a job in Spurs/ Nike's kit design department.
Why do so many of the fan designed kits look so much better than the real ones? Not just ours, but across the board.
Because they either a.) Haven't gone though Nike's photocopier b.) Don't have some designer deciding to be "creative" at the club's expense
Because they spend more than 5 minutes designing them and have actually watched a live game of football?
Four people shot in Toronto as The Raptors and 1.5 million locals celebrate their historic NBA win. Thankfully, nobody dead or critically injured. Word fail me.
