Morning all. Wet start to the day and according to the forecast it is likely to continue until evening. My neighbour has a very large hole in his back garden for a swimming pool. I reckon it will need pumping out before he goes much further.
I think he is watching an Ozzie win...Have a 7-03 train to Taunton in the morning for the Australia Pakistan game. Suspect I won't be seeing much cricket again![]()
Thanks Yorkie!I think he is watching an Ozzie win...
Sent from my F8331 using Tapatalk
Later. : Australia win despite their last six wickets fall like skittles..
A good day for Dan....
[emoji106]
Glad it survived the rain [emoji299]!Thanks Yorkie!
Just got home. Long day but very enjoyable one. A decent game of cricket which was in the balance with 10 overs to go and very good natured and friendly people around us. World cups are great![]()
Unfortunately I saw the political threads described as 'toxic' by a couple of posters - but how can a thread be toxic ? Only people can be toxic. I also noticed that a poster was criticized for spending far too much time on political threads, and hardly contributing to others - to me this is not a valid criticism as people are free to choose on forums like this. If we are only writing about football then this forum would, very quickly, lose a lot of interest. Threads which, together, have attracted 15,000 replies should not be simply discarded because of the discourtious replies of a couple of posters - this is like closing a pub because of the behaviour of one or two guests. I would prefer us to have a wide range of interests represented on here with threads on just about every subject, so that everybody can contribute somewhere, and so that we have the possibility to get to know each other as friends. I think a poster is far less likely to insult, or belittle, another poster if they know them from other threads and have more points of contact with them. So the answer is - if you don't like a thread then open another one which is more to your tasteMorning all. Some sun and cloud forecast for today after overnight rain. Very mild though and the temperature is on the way up again.
Following a number of representations to my mail box, and reading the comments from last night, both our political threads are now locked and unavailable for further comments. Unfortunately this happened in the past over earlier threads as they became playgrounds to throw insults at other posters. I am sorry to have to do this, but when a person or a number of people can only see things in black or white, the areas of grey are not discussed. There are many things happening in the sporting world, so losing these two threads shouldn't be a great loss.
I take what you say and will miss some of the interchange. I think closing the threads was not my preferred option, but clearly the only one the mods felt comfortable to do.Unfortunately I saw the political threads described as 'toxic' by a couple of posters - but how can a thread be toxic ? Only people can be toxic. I also noticed that a poster was criticized for spending far too much time on political threads, and hardly contributing to others - to me this is not a valid criticism as people are free to choose on forums like this. If we are only writing about football then this forum would, very quickly, lose a lot of interest. Threads which, together, have attracted 15,000 replies should not be simply discarded because of the discourtious replies of a couple of posters - this is like closing a pub because of the behaviour of one or two guests. I would prefer us to have a wide range of interests represented on here with threads on just about every subject, so that everybody can contribute somewhere, and so that we have the possibility to get to know each other as friends. I think a poster is far less likely to insult, or belittle, another poster if they know them from other threads and have more points of contact with them. So the answer is - if you don't like a thread then open another one which is more to your taste
It's not right that someone butts in and rubbishes all other views, but action should be taken against that one individual not against the whole thread.A wide range of threads on different subjects sounds fine to me. I agree that people should be allowed to post wherever they wish, however when a decent discussion is underway is it right for someone to butt in and rubbish all other views, then turn against the posters as individuals?
I have found that whatever action you take will not please some, but that comes with the job. You can set standards that you wish to see, but you have to be able to revise them up or down as the situation changes. I have been asked to carry out one of two options and have taken the one that had the majority support.
It's not right that someone butts in and rubbishes all other views, but action should be taken against that one individual not against the whole thread.
I think a new thread with agreement on how to run it... I would not reopen the old ones.. Try for a fresh startAs I said cologne there are two options, and people see things from different positions. I had more people wanting to take them down rather than get rid of someone, and I do read and listen to what people want. My own views are taken into account, but what follows is not always what I would want. If after a period I had sufficient representation to unlock the threads I could, but now is not the time to do that.
Maybe a general thread where you could talk about a few different things. A kind of "get it off your chest" thread!I think a new thread with agreement on how to run it... I would not reopen the old ones.. Try for a fresh start
Sent from my F8331 using Tapatalk