Swarbs Of course it did, even though the rules do state that when the opposing player touches the ball first that being the Arsenal player, then the Liverpool player is on-side. Its like when you cannot be off-side from a corner.
has everyone on 'ere dropped an E or two!? and staged one big **** off lurve in? well beats the hell out who's got the biggest cock compo! BTW I'm withdraw my application on that front!
Yeah, it's just like that. The reason you can't be offside from a corner is that in taking a corner the ball has to be kicked away from goal, i.e. into play from the goal line, and so it is therefore impossible to be in an offside position. You ****ing idiot
That's a comment worthy of KPR. As far as I'm aware, tennis balls don't split your skull open when they hit you at 90 mph. Don't comment on what you don't understand.
Just looked at the weather RHC, looks ok for the next two days in both Southampton and Taunton. Hopefully Warwicks will just bat too long and Hants will do likewise for a draw, the pace we're going at we could yet set up a win or high scoring draw. Or lose heavily. My money, as ever, is on the latter.
A offensive player cannot be in an off-side position or interfering with play if the defending player touches the ball first. This is what happened in the Liverpool vs Arsenal game even if the offensive player was putting pressure on the defending player by being in an advanced position as Suarez was. Suarez never touched the ball thus was not interfering with play. In fact no Liverpool player touched the ball. These are the rules. Therefore, I cannot understand why people keep insisting that both goals were off-side as neither were as Suarez was level on the second. The benefit of the doubt on 9/10 occasions goes with the forward. Therefore Suarez was on-side, thus the decisions were neither dubious or contentious.
Swarbs is wrong. How could Suarez influence the play when the Arsenal player touched the ball first? So if a striker looks at a defender and the ball bounces off another player then the offensive player is interfering with play? The Arsenal player with his intervention kept Suarez on-side. For some reason and this has been debated before there is different phases, you can be off-side in phase one, but on-side in phase two, and therefore on-side. I reckon you lot make stuff up as you go along to suit yourselves.
He took it straight from the rule book. So do all laws of the game not apply because "KPR Said so". Saurez was in an offside position, and he influenced the player into play the balls, if Saurez wasn't there, he's still offside, the defender wouldn't have panicked and played a better or different ball out of the back.
