VDV is better than Gerrard, maybe not in the past but he definately is now, liverpool fans greatly overrate him nowadays. Suarez is far better than lennon however
Maybe not put together , but close enougth, suarez however is one of the best players in the prem aswell as being your best player, so you'd expect him to be better haha
Well if Harry offered a deal - Lennon and VDV for Suarez then he would seriously be taking the piss VDV and Lennon's total value is 15-20 mil tops. We could probably sell Suarez for 30+ quite easily.
Thats including age to it, if lennon had the skill, passing, and shooting + free kicks of VDV he'd be a top player, considering his pace. Also if you put them together would that mean their reactions are twice as good? aswell as there eyesight and etc etc...see where im going with this? if you put two players together they only take one name on the team sheet making them more valuable. your just taking price into account lolz.
Liverpool are treading water, Chelsea are in transition and in 18 months time we will be as good as City and United
Their partnership is thriving in terms of the two players working together and for each other, but hasn't really hit the mark in terms of goals scored - I think the two of them playing together average around one goal every two games which isn't prolific enough imo. If you had Adebayor and Suarez, whilst you may not have the same work rate or understanding, I think you'd get more goals, particularly in games like the Stoke one where you needed someone to take one of the chances that you made.
Nice sly dig there Swarbs!! I see what you're saying but I would rather rely on Kuyt (gives a 110% every game) than have Adebayor who is very much hit and miss. At the end of the day it is a very hypothetical situation as we all know that a team of 11 individuals is pretty useless. So unless Adebayor actually wore our shirt know who's how well he would do. Your original team selection does back up my point that I don't believe many Spurs players would walk into the Liverpool starting 11.
This season offers us a great chance to not only finish 4th, but also to finish above Arsenal, who I truly believe are going to struggle to stay in the top half of the table. I see Liverpool as our main rivals for 4th, but I think the lack the quality to stay the distance. They've made a lot of signings, but all of them have been pretty average. The optimism in their camp will quickly deteriorate as the results start to dry up, and I can see Bling Kenny doing a runner before the end of the season. Having said that, I think they should be good enough for 5th or 6th.
In January the top 4 can buy good players from Stoke, and then they can win more games, so its not worth making a prediction until then.
That is my opinion, and I've tried to be as objective as I can. I think Wenger and Bling Kenny are in a two-horse as to which one of them is going to get sacked first. That's going to be interesting.
Just a few corrections, AVB is 33 not 38 and mancini is not nearly as deffensive now as he was last year, i think he'll turn into a fantastic manager in 2 or 3 years time.
Its who goes where in January.. 1. Man United - Always been a big team, Admiral kit, their home end wasnt all that, and they get some good goals, players that are the bestest might come here as Manchester has money, a gay quarter, and is very diverse, and that. 2. Manchester City - They used to have a lot of scrotes follow them who chucked coins and cans, they were in a Cup Final against Ardiles and his fat mate from Argie, and Hutchinson scored an own goal, their fans sometimes had dreadlocks and were on mountain bikes before mountain bikes came out, and they now have enough money to be dead good and be in the top 4, and players might come here if they like money, and traditionless newly built stadiums full of people not yet missing Maine Road... The coin chuckers dont go anymore, they just sit stringing on learn to play guitar at home, Oasis tracks. 3. Chelsea - Greedy players like it here because it has shopping empires, airports, and they can buy giant watches and not be noticed. The fans are tyre collectors or salesmen and deepen their voice when they are actually skinny gobs on sticks from areas not near Battersea, like Feltham, or Runnymeade, yeh, exactly. 4. Arsenal - really odd Club that got fooking hooped off Barcelona at Wembley, that every man and his dog got tickets to from Exchange and Mart for 60 quid, says it all, half a stadium full of spaced out Winston Spanglers, who have so much spare cash, they cannot think of a more interesting day out than an Arsenal home game...at the Spacebowl. 5. Liverpool - steeped in history, lots of second club fans about who want them to do well, but thats because there was only 3 fooking tv channels when they were growing up, and thats when they were the goodest, before everything went through fooking Gerrard for boring European 1-1 draws on Channel 5. The twats bought Souness and Craig Johnston, but what did they care, they just wanted to score goals and sing about fooking ducks. Ooh look, the Kop are singing You'll never walk alone, before kick off, when told to do so, like performing seals. Marmite Spaniards. I go for Chelsea, because even tho its a **** heap to live in, the greediest players are used to it. 1. Utd 2. City 3. Liverpool 4 Chelsea 5 Spurs Arsenal http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpGiUNqXUCQ&feature=related
also, there was an Arsenal fan on Talk Sport today, and he said this and that about Wenger man, and he said "Wenger transformed the game in England, changing how the players ate, and made it all nutritional" It bothers me slightly, that we have football obsessed thirty year olds, who know all about Messi and that, but **** all whatsoever about their own national game, HODDLE changed nutrition, you stupid fooking top 4 supporting radio clown!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
