Your avoidance is getting quite tiresome now. And you're making more & more stuff up as you go along. So, once again, as it's still 100% relevant & I won't give up this time. ... More Chesh snash. Quel surpris. Still trying to move the discussion everywhere but where it should be. As usual. I refer you back to the original question, which is post #9145. Again. Your 'made up' wild, unfounded statement, which generated my question, is asserted by you in the previous post. So not made up by me at all - it's there for all to see. Apart from you, apparently. please log in to view this image please log in to view this image please log in to view this image please log in to view this image please log in to view this image
Laughing at Chesh. He's been found out & it's fun watching him wriggle. His MO is that he published totally unfounded pish. If asked a question about it that might question it's reliability, he refuses to answer the question & fires off loads of tangentially tangents in the hope that the questioner will get bored. Much of it is personalised too, as you can see. Even when you provide solid evidence of something you've stated, he ignores it, twists it, & gets personal. I have got bored many times before, but have decided to pursue this one. All he has to do is answer the simple question in post #1145. He won't, because he can't.
All made up no such sect, and then you said you and your family are part of the loony sect and attended the same sect church. , so now we know Trump has no link with any loony sect, but you do. All true, after all you said it. go back to burrying your head in the sand, and carry on denying 9/11,and 7/7 etc happened, no point trying to get you to see it, as you have your head in the sand
WJ's lost the plot,made wild stupid claims about Trump, them admitted he was on about himself in the sect meetings not Trump. Didn't have time to go to London but will catch up with Donald later
I'm enjoying watching you wriggle on the hook. Still not answering the question. Perhaps you should look up the definition of sect. It EXACTLY defines the Wee Frees, effectively a breakaway from the Kirk o' Scotland. Indeed, I believe it was in the linked article I posted earlier, that you clearly didn't read. Or ignored, which is more likely. And expected. Next, I said no such thing. I am not a Wee Free. Indeed, you will find that I stated that I was not religious a few posts back, which again, you either failed to read, or again, probably ignored like you do with all facts that don't support your lunatic notions. Now I'm really looking forward to this one - where have I ever denied 7/7 or 9/11? Another evidence request for you to ignore. You may not be aware that I missed being a sad statistic of 7/7 by approximately 3 minutes. I got the last tube out of Edgeware road. It is not something I joke about nor particularly want to discuss. You've unknowingly crossed a line with this one. I'm still waiting on you answering the question presented in post #9145. I think it is fair for all to assume that as you are clearly unable to substantiate your wild statement with facts, you have made it up. Feel free to prove me wrong with evidence, but we both know that can't happen, because it doesn't exist.
Wee frees, are they the ones who had a minister saying the tsunami’s were divine retribution for people sunbathing on the sabbath or some such offensive bollox? Or was that a different bunch of god fearing nutters.
I obviously missed that. Could you refer me to the post that has your evidential links in it, please? Pretty sure there weren't any.
Cheers, Mate. Edited. Not that it'll help Chesh anyway. He knows fine well where it is & will continue to avoid it as he can't answer it without acknowledging he was talking utter pish in the previous post.
Was it before the made up story about Trump or after you said you and your family used to go the meetings ?
