Rangers v Celtic

The benefits of having no history

 

Where you there early May 2007?

<Tannerman>

 

Is that relevant to this discussion. The woman isn't in the paper slating Rangers.

You're deflection does not wash.

 

****s mentally ill

Must defend shellick!!

 

Check out this cùnt making up shìt about child abuse to try and score points.

Taigs are really horrible people.

 

It's not "deflection" when you - with your pitchfork and flaming torch - have slated Celtic to high heaven for their alleged inaction,whilst conveniently ignoring Rangers' disgusting behaviour. I can easily show people slating Rangers for their failure to deal with victims of child abuse or is that not relevant either?

Is it only relevant when it's in the newspaper?

 

Almost two years ago, David, who is a season ticket holder at Ibrox, spoke to a solicitor about the alleged abuse and was advised to make a claim against Rangers. Rangers' lawyers said the club offered its "deepest concern", however, it made it clear that any compensation claim would be for the liquidators of the company which had previously owned the club.

David told the BBC: "My issue's always been that they may be a …different legal entity, but they're still the same club. And although they don't have the same maybe liability legally, certainly morally they're still the same club." A statement from Rangers Football Club said they would "co-operate fully" with all those who had a "genuine interest" in seeking to protect children and "addressing the wrongs" of what had happened in the past.

It said that both the Scottish FA and Police Scotland had been informed of the matter. The statement added: "It is vital matters are dealt with sensitively and with proper care and regard for those involved. "We will not respond to questions that seek to turn allegations of desperate and deplorable conduct from three or more decades ago into cheap and nasty attacks on Rangers Football Club, and those of its employees who now have to attend to such difficult matters."

Pat Mair from Scottish charity Talk Now which counsels victims of sexual abuse has worked with adults who suffered in childhood.

She said: "The survivors are looking for acknowledgment, they're looking for communication with the football clubs where they were abused. "The abuse happened at Rangers Football Club but they are not taking any responsibility and it's as if they're not accountable for it."

 

Rangers disgusting action?

What would that be?

 

Is this the disgusting actions you're referring to then?

 

What would you call it?

 

I slated Rangers in here for doing that you tit. On more than one occasion. I certainly didn't try to make any excuses for them because there is none.

Big fat Dev fail.

 

Dev is probably involved in the Celtic ***** ring Mindy was probably a willing victim ,

 

Twice iirc.

Swiftly moving on to link Celtic to abuse carried out by another entity.

GET YOUR OWN HOUSE IN ORDER FIRST.

[emoji41]

 

Twice you say!

So more than once then.

Fanks pal for corroborating my honesty.

 

To my priest, but the Church is also a seperate entity and huns can't seem to get their heads round either.

 

So Ireland and Catholicism are seperate from Celtic FC ?

OK didn`t know that

 

BHEASTIC now selling "Grooming Products"!! How brazen can these **** get!!!

please log in to view this image

 

I`m using a laptop and just seen your Sig lol

 

Yes and you swiftly moved on from briefly slating Rangers (once or twice) to absolutely vilifying Celtic for months (maybe years) on end.

As Mindy says, get your own house in order, if you are so desperate to get "justice" for victims of child sex abuse would it not be better to concentrate on Rangers? Simply slating them on here once or twice just looks a bit feeble.

 

I think everyone is hoping you will just apologise for making excuses for *****philes at CELTIC fc then I`m sure nobody will bring up the topic again .