Like I said mate, it's a confusing issue. Some managers, pundits, and even retired officials who can't count are so taken with the "interfering with play" part of the rules that they forget the "interfering with an opponent" and "gaining an advantage" parts. I agree that it's not an open and shut case by any stretch of the imagination. But given that Suarez was close enough to pressure him when he made his first touch, I would argue that is interfering with an opponent. Either way, the fact that it is up for debate indicates that it was a contentious decision that went Liverpool's way.
If she had Crohn's Disease, I wouldn't be anywhere near her. The eel butty would work though..........................
RHC - http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/scorecards/default.stm Bollocks. Our best hope is rain then a contrived one inning slog, see who comes out on top in both. How the **** did we lose to Worcester in two days FFS?!!!
Yes, I'm gay. Ever played cricket? I'd ****ing love to send a ball at your head at 90mph and see how gay you are.
That's where we lost the whole thing. We HAVE to win and Warwicks draw or get beaten. None of that is looking likely just now
Really p....s me off when people who don't understand cricket slag it off. I love Liverpool FC, but I love cricket as well. For me, test cricket is the purest sport in the world.
NEVER a truer word spoken. Who'd have thought after our initial spats all those weeks ago, eh? I love test cricket, beats any sport anywhere in the world.