1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Debunking the 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by Medro, Sep 12, 2011.

  1. Medro

    Medro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    16,416
    Likes Received:
    356
    You got a link to this because I heard him saying on tv that it could withstand a plane crashing into it but they hadn't taken on board the amount of fuel that would be present, to torch a whole floor.
     
    #61
  2. eddieveeee

    eddieveeee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    3,535
    Likes Received:
    2
    its in the video I just posted Medro if you actually watched it, which is clear you dont, you dont want to know anything against your official theory

    6.15

    [video=youtube;uQkr_WOUwXc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQkr_WOUwXc[/video]
     
    #62
  3. Sam Axe

    Sam Axe Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    7,355
    Likes Received:
    7
    Even if it was said, it was just a guy talking up his design to impress the higher ups and the public much like the creators of the Titanic did.
     
    #63
  4. RAVENBLACK

    RAVENBLACK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    24,877
    Likes Received:
    265
    Really. How would the plane stay in the air then.

    Of course they didnt account for the fuel dumbo.
     
    #64
  5. eddieveeee

    eddieveeee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    3,535
    Likes Received:
    2
    do you think the people who produced this magnificent feat of engineering designed them to withstand plane carshes, thought the planes where going to be flying with no fuel?

    what did they think? the wind was going to carry a plane into it?

    think how ******ed your statement is.
     
    #65
  6. Calatron

    Calatron Active Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,526
    Likes Received:
    2
    Eddiiveee think clearly for a moment and look at this link, it describes how famous 9/11 theorists made 'tons of money' selling 9/11 The Real Truth' videos, selling advertising and merchandise seems you and many other theorists were literally 'buying into it' <laugh> http://ae911truth.info/wordpress/
     
    #66

  7. Medro

    Medro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    16,416
    Likes Received:
    356
    Where is that link.

    The amount of fuel is what they didn't take into consideration.
     
    #67
  8. eddieveeee

    eddieveeee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    3,535
    Likes Received:
    2
    yeah because the creators of the titanic said, this ship is built to withstand icebergs?

    totally different age of technology, totally irrelevant, try again
     
    #68
  9. thefanwithnoname

    thefanwithnoname Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,399
    Likes Received:
    2,952
    the collapse of the buildings is attributed to the fires and not the planes as such. Of course the impact of the planes is thought to have played a role. However NIST's whole paper/theory is based on fires

    fires which didnt even burn hot enough to blow the windows out

    even FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) are said to have said it had "only a low probability of occurrence."
     
    #69
  10. eddieveeee

    eddieveeee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    3,535
    Likes Received:
    2
    its at 6.15 in the video i posted medro, are you going to ignore it again?
     
    #70
  11. RAVENBLACK

    RAVENBLACK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    24,877
    Likes Received:
    265
    Everything is ultimately about money.

    Apart from Rangers FC that is.
     
    #71
  12. Sam Axe

    Sam Axe Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    7,355
    Likes Received:
    7
    How is it totally irrelevant? The designers of anything will always say that it is the biggest and best. Architects will always say their buildings are best, ship builders will always say their ships are unsinkable. Their pride and bias on their project cannot be trusted 100%. That was my point.
     
    #72
  13. thefanwithnoname

    thefanwithnoname Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,399
    Likes Received:
    2,952
    It is usually a federal offense to remove anything from a crime scene. But here the removal of over 100 tons of steel, the biggest destruction of evidence in history, was carried out under the supervision of federal officials, how do you explain that
     
    #73
  14. Calatron

    Calatron Active Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,526
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ok Eddievee and fellow conspirators time to put you all to bed literally now read carefully as people on this thread have said the same things on here <ok>

    People in caves could not carry out the attack.

    This racist comment ignores the education and training of the terrorists. Bin Laden graduated from college a civil engineer and some of the terrorists are out of college
    You don't need government help or a university degree to scare passengers into thinking you have a bomb onboard.
    You don't need government help to turn off an airliner transponder and hide among hundreds of other airliners in the area

    The towers were built to withstand more than one airliner impact!!!!
    The NIST never said the impact collapsed the towers
    The towers DID withstand the impact. It was a combination of fire, impact damage and lack of fireproofing over the steel in the impact levels which collapsed the towers.
    Plans were drawn up in 1949(WTC) , planes are heavier and faster than back then.

    People heard explosions indicating explosives were used
    Each floor had about an acre of 3" - 4 " concrete flooring. The sound of that plus office furniture and equipment collapsing on an office below would make a very loud boom.
    Steel snapping under tension would make a very loud boom.
    Large transformers exploding in the building would make a very loud boom.
     
    #74
  15. eddieveeee

    eddieveeee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    3,535
    Likes Received:
    2
    The 3 buildings falling all defy physics, no one has come up with an explanation as to why those building fell, let alone why they fell the way they did, at free fall speed, and turning into dust, firing 2 ton steel beems hundreds of feet.

    Have you got any idea what type of energy it would take to do that,to fire that kind of weight so far? The use of explosives would explain everything, yet you dont want to even consider it.

    That to me is insane.
     
    #75
  16. thefanwithnoname

    thefanwithnoname Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,399
    Likes Received:
    2,952
    agree with some of that, and that is why we should question

    for me the explanation of the steel beams warping is plausible, not the 47 steel core that went through the whole building. They should have stood, or bent at the extreme, not fall in on themselves
     
    #76
  17. RAVENBLACK

    RAVENBLACK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    24,877
    Likes Received:
    265
    Utter poppycock.

    And why did no-one get to see Bin Bags body before they dumped it in the sea.

    DNA of some distant relative my ****in arse
     
    #77
  18. Calatron

    Calatron Active Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,526
    Likes Received:
    2
    Again I will debunk you and hope this is the last I hear:

    The floors of the towers fell straight down while the perimeter columns leaned out
    These buildings could not collapse any other way due to the design of the building. It was not a solid block.
    Neither building had the tube in a tube design used at the WTC
    Unlike the towers, both buildings had their steel columns encased in concrete
    The steel which was not protected with concrete in the Madrid towers also collapsed early on just like in the towers

    The towers fell at free fall/near free fall speed
    In every video and photo you can see the perimeter columns far outpacing the collapse.
    The building took over 12-16 seconds to completely collapse. The actual event was covered by debris so no one can say for sure. One rare video has the south tower collapsing at about 22 seconds.
    Conspiracy theorists cut their videos out when the perimeter columns hit the ground and not the building.
     
    #78
  19. eddieveeee

    eddieveeee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    3,535
    Likes Received:
    2
    <laugh><laugh><laugh><laugh><laugh>

    computers and phones falling down one floor sounded like an explosions wahhahabhahahaha

    awww u have made my day already with that effort calatron <laugh><laugh><laugh> ****in epic

    Can i ask you something cal, this is pretty irrelevant beacause the temps were not even half of what required to melt bare steel, but do you know what expiriment nist done to work out how the fireproofing was dislodged?

    i do, im just asking if you do, seen as you have copy and pasted 2 small paragraphs and think you achieved something
     
    #79
  20. Calatron

    Calatron Active Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,526
    Likes Received:
    2
    Explain why it is Poppycock come on debunk what I told you and we are not talking about Bin Laden's body here we are talking about the twin towers.
     
    #80

Share This Page