made to look lie a schoolkid? im one person against 300 brick walls on here and I have shown you all up, dylan avery is a useless **** notice how the official conspiracy theory programs dont attempt to go against Kevin Ryan or david ray griffin you fail to see the biiger pricture of what these programs are about
what theorys have i actually said? all i have done is show how the official theory is bullshit you lot choose to accept a theory by the LMD, i have shown their lies, and how they have lied about 9/11, i can do no more than that when asked how could they have done it, i have shown that it could be possible that they done it, like motive, means, access, guilty demeanour. No one can show the same for a non existant organisation called al qaeda
9/11 documentaries to commemorate 9/11. what do you really think they were going to say? FFS they still arguing that there are WMD's in Iraq
I am a realist and get this KID, Bin Laden was real he had attacked the US many times before 9/11 the bombers were real, the planes hitting were real and the towers fell there is no conspiracy in there but like I said you feel the need to question everything and make mountains out of molehills, if you want a real conspiracy try JFK, Diana etc
2 of the biggest buildings in the world turn to dust in 10 seconds and you have shown how that is possible? Bin Laden was real yes, they funded him, they made him the posterchild of a non existant, never ending war. you are a realist who has no clue about how the world is run there has to be a conspiracy you ****in ******, one way or the other, someone conspired to make 9/11 happen, u believe the LMD on what conspiracy is real, and I will believe the one that makes the most sense.
This, you have no clue eddievee......................now what homework do you have to do tonight hope for your sake it isn't RE as that is boring
the buildings where designed to withstand multiple plane crashes, they were built exactly for that ****ing purpose.
had he? from what i know the bin laden family were mates with the bush family. even had joint business ventures so tell me why was Iraq attacked, and what was the purpose of attacking afghanistan, because tbh i still dont know tony blair wrote a paper entitled "Responsibility for the Terrorist Atrocities in the United States." But it begins with the admission that it "does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Usama Bin Laden in a court of law. so evidence enough to go to war, but not enough to prosecute enemy number one. And although the Taliban said that it would hand bin Laden over if the United States presented evidence of his involvement in 9/11, Bush refused but we 'knew' he wasnt there dont we? we went to liberate the women, right? you know the ones who the current PM says can be raped by their hubbies oh wait it wasnt that.....
Oh yeah I have heard that it is an industry standard test to make sure of that when building anything
you have ****ing nothing, nothing, you have been destroyed you want architects and demo experts? here is why you have your head up your arse if you think a plane is going to take down a building like that [video=youtube;uQkr_WOUwXc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQkr_WOUwXc[/video]
interesting document. did they really not know? Statement of Secretary of Transportation Norman Y. Mineta before the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, May 23, 2003" (available at www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/2003/commissiontestimony052303.htm).
Find me proof other than a nutjob who wants there to be a theory, that the WTC was built to withstand Aeroplanes considering the blueprint and materials needed were drawn up in 1949!!!! Long before Boeing 747 jet fuelled planes were flying around another theory debunked.
